Re: RFC 9226 on Bioctal: Hexadecimal 2.0

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 03 April 2022 00:21 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E10F3A1886 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Apr 2022 17:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9HdGPmjsg6J8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Apr 2022 17:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E2A43A1892 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2022 17:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7A338D40 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2022 20:31:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id k4kYuTgQBday for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2022 20:31:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA1638D3E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2022 20:31:58 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1648945918; bh=xDYcf58nal2z9ORfnwmx6xLZSRB6/MNB6m6H1AjUhDY=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=azxqiFlVRvTf1j3z4fuMxJcuLJjZwCeZG7x3XKTPDeVJktoJoP8Zo/S22mn31LBpj +SLhp1jcG1j64fj0qCIRCcB6JJmMf912mZf7oYvMQXauxGwxKr+wroJAMKu1Ij8FTp M8MHWc1Epm3R4RpotCm1sRQN3fVLDr8fZCiLrNdFRHarVcj4fbEXlf36v8F0FunHMv gFcmlVvMgPcS/gqZiCQGUAeL52dpo6+fzjs9dpGh07w4y1i/PeV5VBB/YFSUixQFDS bNWbmpHgzSpoKRCde1Ji82fmTNUgVUTYaYh2HVkbcUfOanbgGvWqxO3UtaEhLbEmpK uZ1fdhyO5p07w==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4823E9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2022 20:21:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: RFC 9226 on Bioctal: Hexadecimal 2.0
In-Reply-To: <20220401212132.2C8676AAD1@rfcpa.amsl.com>
References: <20220401212132.2C8676AAD1@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2022 20:21:00 -0400
Message-ID: <651.1648945260@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/oZTYticXVHzHeqCy83KC1ZvQhRQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2022 00:21:10 -0000

I wish that more RFCs had such well thought out Security Considerations.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide