Re: RFC 9226 on Bioctal: Hexadecimal 2.0
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 03 April 2022 00:21 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E10F3A1886
for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Apr 2022 17:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 9HdGPmjsg6J8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 2 Apr 2022 17:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E2A43A1892
for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2022 17:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7A338D40
for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2022 20:31:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id k4kYuTgQBday for <ietf@ietf.org>;
Sat, 2 Apr 2022 20:31:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247])
by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA1638D3E
for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2022 20:31:58 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail;
t=1648945918; bh=xDYcf58nal2z9ORfnwmx6xLZSRB6/MNB6m6H1AjUhDY=;
h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
b=azxqiFlVRvTf1j3z4fuMxJcuLJjZwCeZG7x3XKTPDeVJktoJoP8Zo/S22mn31LBpj
+SLhp1jcG1j64fj0qCIRCcB6JJmMf912mZf7oYvMQXauxGwxKr+wroJAMKu1Ij8FTp
M8MHWc1Epm3R4RpotCm1sRQN3fVLDr8fZCiLrNdFRHarVcj4fbEXlf36v8F0FunHMv
gFcmlVvMgPcS/gqZiCQGUAeL52dpo6+fzjs9dpGh07w4y1i/PeV5VBB/YFSUixQFDS
bNWbmpHgzSpoKRCde1Ji82fmTNUgVUTYaYh2HVkbcUfOanbgGvWqxO3UtaEhLbEmpK
uZ1fdhyO5p07w==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4823E9
for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2022 20:21:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: RFC 9226 on Bioctal: Hexadecimal 2.0
In-Reply-To: <20220401212132.2C8676AAD1@rfcpa.amsl.com>
References: <20220401212132.2C8676AAD1@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;
<'$9xN5Ub#
z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2022 20:21:00 -0400
Message-ID: <651.1648945260@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/oZTYticXVHzHeqCy83KC1ZvQhRQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>,
<mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
<mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2022 00:21:10 -0000
I wish that more RFCs had such well thought out Security Considerations. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
- Re: RFC 9226 on Bioctal: Hexadecimal 2.0 Michael Richardson
- Re: RFC 9226 on Bioctal: Hexadecimal 2.0 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RFC 9226 on Bioctal: Hexadecimal 2.0 John Levine