IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets

Peter Sylvester <peter.sylvester@edelweb.fr> Mon, 23 April 2012 21:40 UTC

Return-Path: <peter.sylvester@edelweb.fr>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A94921E802D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80tdGZ3ZU2uU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.on-x.com (mx1.on-x.com [92.103.215.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F135721E800F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from varuna.puteaux.on-x (varuna.puteaux.on-x [192.168.10.6]) by mx1.on-x.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4EE7EC9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:40:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtps.on-x.com (mintaka.puteaux.on-x [192.168.14.11]) by varuna.puteaux.on-x (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C5C7849DD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:36:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.0.27] (gut75-3-82-227-163-182.fbx.proxad.net [82.227.163.182]) by smtps.on-x.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D4F823636F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:34:59 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4F95CC3D.6030507@edelweb.fr>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:40:13 +0200
From: Peter Sylvester <peter.sylvester@edelweb.fr>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120411 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
References: <2AC114D8-E97B-47A0-B7E0-9EF016DCB09F@ietf.org> <4F94D01F.3070102@gondrom.org> <DDB8050A-7A04-4A0F-A364-0E3E511DCB43@vigilsec.com> <4F94E4AB.5080706@gondrom.org> <m27gx7uip4.wl%randy@psg.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1204231320120.41282@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1204231320120.41282@fledge.watson.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:40:18 -0000

On 04/23/2012 07:23 PM, Samuel Weiler wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> i see ourselves some years from now having electronic tracking of whether X was in the room 
>> during which parts of the discussion.  do not like.
>
> +1
>
> I am very sympathetic to the desire to minimize the work of responding to subpoenas.  A very 
> effective way to do that is to not have the data.
>
> I would strongly prefer to see the blue sheets disappear entirely. Let's quit collecting data that 
> we don't need.  The collection of attendee lists does not directly support our technical work.  To 
> the extent that we need a headcount for meeting planning, a count (without names) is sufficient.
>
> -- Sam
+1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email