Re: IETF LLC & IETF Participation from USA-sanctioned countries

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sun, 07 March 2021 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7043A1B9B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 11:42:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iJTg_7s-cvZP for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 11:42:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1EAF3A1B9A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 11:42:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D7332A9; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 14:42:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 07 Mar 2021 14:42:02 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=YRUqKkP/eG+0j5RSKO9UesFGUU7saDvMFuPGQYTmK BY=; b=eTZilyajnkoohdNyvb1oVNVqAa+vTS49XMT4xskhqg90b0eSFe2ck0OAV 47uDcCxQlc2u9RRicCIXajSKEFzopP0xNWPkU6fnaW0/NF0H4JMvdreIVF3vk2kR ENwWrWr/dD40v5mXysVherUIpMlIpKE2qpvQOu3vhPm43UqYfz8c3MtJx3c36OLd mWstlaOSGLnbdIQFmkPF2uO306G+hl04NEuYiCyBntbZbzBzg/9eCNClKMNV8LG7 FVCkSv9gZBzMDXjsraP8CxuTTsDel38c+/vYtz1PVrC4Wwj50QRN8/w4Yi1j++7B mYTl5Vy4R9Qy6FSJOoyn42WN4D4eA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:iSxFYMK8ZzhwuSHmC0D5NaGLEysTjtVsZmXADEVh1MFMFgRNF2YZrg> <xme:iSxFYMLGj75uV3SS_jpq8AlVeaESBx_CTwCcjo4oW6o5xoyOdXdYxEleaI9m0xxXa uPwkatZx5doPg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledruddutddguddukecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghi thhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtoh hmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeehhfeutdehfefgfefghfekhefguefgieduueegjeek feelleeuieffteefueduueenucfkphepuddtkedrvddvuddrudektddrudehnecuvehluh hsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgv thifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:iSxFYMtEAr5pp-HhQlW70VFYMIFhAFQCqyJU8HJxBVHAFuMwnBIigw> <xmx:iSxFYJYYzarFkD4iQC3_HdbHyNjLd0pelz7FLFgMtGjLfOQbOFHn_Q> <xmx:iSxFYDYA9vdRusg3X7vieprQr5gvpNMKu1FOeGE355cSwR4I4kYzBw> <xmx:iixFYMk99gXxlBXdS4BOuDMTle6-oeUfIuqZ273Xza3qLw8NQetQBA>
Received: from [192.168.1.90] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 62726240054; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 14:42:01 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: IETF LLC & IETF Participation from USA-sanctioned countries
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <4619acc8-1ed4-52e8-849b-bfda9de61bb0@gont.com.ar> <20210303221433.ufsitioimata4dtg@crankycanuck.ca> <4739AA0B-95BA-48C8-A17D-730EAF547F55@gmail.com> <20210304155203.n5cfd3kmu2fpgdrt@crankycanuck.ca> <4FCD1F07-6DE9-402F-AFD3-A3C42F3D0ACF@cisco.com> <5a221b8f-73d8-037d-9b4f-f51a9c54e3bd@network-heretics.com> <20210304195744.jbgzpjlegbogmxu4@crankycanuck.ca> <dc91126f-59e8-e2f0-213c-e622b8ea0aa5@network-heretics.com> <25E6DFA6-C70D-4094-AC8C-19E0DBD46AEE@cisco.com> <54fd914c-a95c-2cef-658a-1bcd5e9e47a6@network-heretics.com> <eaf1cf64-83bb-88f4-5673-de73d5038ded@si6networks.com> <31743.1615133499@localhost> <7f457f48-197e-1c01-674e-1701a029e115@network-heretics.com> <110df203-044b-aba9-00a3-e34a06162754@huitema.net>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <896036c9-141a-d731-3d36-ebae6b10a24c@network-heretics.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 14:42:00 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <110df203-044b-aba9-00a3-e34a06162754@huitema.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/og-rMvRa-P11WBiC9SanJM17ZAw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 19:42:05 -0000

On 3/7/21 2:14 PM, Christian Huitema wrote:

>>
>> No, we need to know, even if we won't like the answer, and even if we 
>> can't change the situation.    Far too much prejudice is perpetuated 
>> by those kinds of taboos.
>
> This is not exactly an issue of prejudice. AFAIK, we do not have 
> checks to verify that some new subscriber to an IETF working group is 
> not accessing the server from a penalized country through a VPN, or 
> any such workaround. We don't really want to set up any check like 
> that, because they are intrusive and complicated, and also because 
> they are beyond commonly held standards. Yet, if we conducted an in 
> depth study of the issue, who knows whether some bureaucrat somewhere 
> would force the IETF to enforce such checks, or force the LLC to spend 
> a good chunk of money asserting our rights to not do that. It is 
> probably much wiser to let sleeping dogs lie.
>
Any time someone says we shouldn't ask whether we're effectively 
discriminating against people in some way, that's a huge red flag.

Keith