Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Mon, 12 April 2021 22:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD093A1116 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EiIoOfvYQSuJ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:04:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x532.google.com (mail-pg1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 214373A110B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:04:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x532.google.com with SMTP id f29so10457539pgm.8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:04:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc.com; s=fluffulence; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=j5Mm7u3SyU6td36Xei+5cO7hivopJXUdu6rZsgtIXXo=; b=Qh4pCTIR2unuATp3TW8gpQx4b3OmEdpieM1hIoZiblSgjh/1z3GI+j4gC6I9NKNW33 /SR7fj4+nf/YoZOR1l92a6T4e6Q+tniwCvWfrUFULABR75WEq0XGB5e8E7W63nFMYpPq RabsdxtNcuA40cAfaaSXbzr8bSJbnYZGA3gDmTfPcSh14Y0c8D2DSu7kKzGBcgxWnaQg /w/Q5J/Nl+JXfhn7zxqOjR09eVD04YAvf1hBn7nW06EWJG/TngYcRzSlwnfdZmO7Buyu NgIj3FUx+2q9oCkunX5jmL7io+NtRjoFIa6Nt5dc6vHL1R5bRM5p6UGwmRFzcvpBRtnn GolA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=j5Mm7u3SyU6td36Xei+5cO7hivopJXUdu6rZsgtIXXo=; b=RZA9kFs2TQR41wv/XqA0wLbD0DF+YIv5kjhp0bZoCKZzEIKqKzaSEq5j5q+oFjMBUX m43mtiNjbNxNQ1BnOpzTwtVuD/hSv5oYVO4Ym9wYxH1Pjd/shUKgvV2iI/2oN88Ol5hG cDnP/s+yGe030gAYuApQqh9VT7QdZpajacrMRz9YIuyXICw4sz48VsMEMLUjpsIUmtnD EZGwtIIm5A9ZKR43lYQqbWzcuc6uSd7OHlL+iqNLEX5WsAQXVWmww+iv//LNSI6U3YYo MekMDxvqE+9GMC3w/mE9q7goy2JLq8dfyxFl9bKtit86uc5X3wC0gXlz6hwbY8PffAmG auDw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533chDFBF6j56sqwB6vs8NzS2JwCwzVzXHCXkXqlO3IrCmbYbV/y fQ3/qA9vBDY+u9ys1R3xyxdW7r3ebF3HXg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw3sbp4aLXU6QE9KcNg+zpRazgAWnH8hLQhfpBHZZc9ovRs/k7Lle8LrJUOSHso28gMYbn1mA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:4944:: with SMTP id y4mr29580100pgk.9.1618265074960; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-38-56.volcanocom.com. [107.182.38.56]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fs9sm344075pjb.40.2021.04.12.15.04.33 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <3593a01f-73f4-7d03-a85b-dff64a8b070e@mtcc.com> <CABrd9STZXonBDvWB7Z36H2mD20Juubc01TUmEvpfWkvJggQVOQ@mail.gmail.com> <ab6bcbf0-646c-9f2d-5f98-fdc3e9ba27bf@mtcc.com> <CABrd9STEqvgexYKTUdFqn1zu=U2+h92_aDS6rM=8xcwibNJM3A@mail.gmail.com> <YHMc54xe1Mnx2U2y@straasha.imrryr.org> <CABrd9SShpOnSpshnMZSag4ZVp6ic5tURFoH9RzT0WCXDHyxgkA@mail.gmail.com> <YHN5ObR0eqea8Mrc@straasha.imrryr.org> <CABrd9SRdw9baHD5-j9nz4Zv5JjfL35TgaTvS787orEyGxZdKzA@mail.gmail.com> <YHOAzeOj1JaGdmsO@straasha.imrryr.org> <5e91c054-5935-df07-e8ba-09cc78f6c950@network-heretics.com> <YHPSP8Kij2K4v7qQ@straasha.imrryr.org> <82c5fcc6-b419-6efb-b682-b5dbb32905e2@network-heretics.com> <585D8590-472B-4CBC-8292-5BE85521DD76@gmail.com>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <a6545baf-b15e-3690-d7b5-be33c4078e02@mtcc.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:04:32 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <585D8590-472B-4CBC-8292-5BE85521DD76@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/og6LJ8SG3O0C669IVeB4KWhj0S8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 22:04:41 -0000

On 4/12/21 5:39 AM, Petite Abeille wrote:
>
>> On Apr 12, 2021, at 14:25, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the update.   It looks as if progress is indeed being made.   Now I wonder: what is being done to publicize DNSSEC to try to get wider adoption?
> As it stands — one has to get out of its way to find it.
>
> dnsimple has good support for it out-of-the-box:
>
> https://support.dnsimple.com/articles/dnssec/
>
> https://dnssec-analyzer.verisignlabs.com/textprotocol.com
> https://dnssec-analyzer.verisignlabs.com/textprotocol.net
>
One of the interesting revelations is that:

1) Google implemented DANE at one point in Chrome

2) Google doesn't currently sign their zone

The implication being that it wasn't a very serious effort to see what 
would happen if they don't even sign their own domain.

Mike