Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 23 October 2021 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62743A0A55 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 07:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wF4PkJVr0CCE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 07:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 860403A0A24 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 07:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (eduroam-pool13-1397.wlan.uni-bremen.de [134.102.165.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Hc3g66qp7z30RR; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 16:36:02 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CDD17BF9-BBF6-413F-80A6-2928995807C1@akamai.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 16:36:02 +0200
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E7519FEC-2208-4468-B2B7-E6EDA9C038CC@tzi.org>
References: <394BBA1E-FA83-4E80-A143-BE3F0764DCDA@tzi.org> <F2D8B2B0-1005-424F-9984-3AC6F951E02F@eggert.org> <CDD17BF9-BBF6-413F-80A6-2928995807C1@akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/omAXylbj5cQ11FY3v8H8WdSijuE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 14:36:09 -0000

On 23. Oct 2021, at 16:16, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> What should they choose? 

That depends a lot on the ideology we choose to turn into IETF consensus.
(Which may occasionally need to be explained by the nomcom chair.)

Grüße, Carsten