IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv10.

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Fri, 11 November 2016 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=1123fa51e4=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A58129653 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 05:33:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=jordi.palet@consulintel.es header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T5Rr6ttJgOXR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 05:33:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [217.126.185.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 905A4129405 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 05:33:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1478871219; x=1479476019; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic: References:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=rsketot6Y/L6niCq70xguWuPH 0cFr8NDh0IhIpFKJoY=; b=VfBvcfQJ+Fg3QqWCsnVBXdO4ueiwSsSg6CHu55WwG vPQR1kdqiWWyb0CeLW+fyWfN+lfsDGM6RC9vz22vD1WTqmkak+0BjfCqHxBlrwlF U+47OivJG8kPoEc8Q0HizRYypUVUKHJ3iQzSiouuMo5hiL7edGx+0MEduTeb71kk m4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=j0gd+xiW/GWPLvra1fS7RRuX/OIqQJHuTJ8dKCbvxJxxRzjjkb4cuDOBlXiz DYJTO6mncV+cGZNApDv0fUdDN/G2ycqUKJhBSB7VHGud9DoVmZlVmJh1K p5S6nsEPrq4zyHL/A/ASGzfkfd3gqsDLqKbFizZe1fSAU2HtO5BjxQ=;
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:33:39 +0100
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:33:38 +0100
Received: from [10.10.10.99] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50005217242.msg for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:33:38 +0100
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-HashCash: 1:20:161111:md50005217242::WaCykoLf99pjAMxg:000064If
X-Return-Path: prvs=1123fa51e4=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ietf@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1b.0.161010
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:33:34 +0100
Subject: Re: IPv10.
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C35D9E93-2008-4BE3-82ED-FE4BE4602133@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: IPv10.
References: <HE1PR04MB1449514D421EAC698335EE99BDBB0@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR04MB1449514D421EAC698335EE99BDBB0@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/omeqx78X6EVjyQDL43lCAmynZg0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 13:33:47 -0000

Hi Khaled,

Do you have a pointer to an ID?

I’ve found only this http://internetprotocolv10.blogspot.co.uk/

To be honest, I’m very sceptical to what I’ve read there. I think we have IPv6 already, and there is no sense to work on something new … However, you may need to work in a BoF for this. Are you coming to the next meeting?

Regards,
Jordi


-----Mensaje original-----
De: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
Responder a: <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
Fecha: viernes, 11 de noviembre de 2016, 14:08
Para: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Asunto: IPv10.

    Hi all IETF members and the discussion panel,
     
    Hope you are all fine,
     
    I wish I’m not bothering you by my e-mails, but all what I’m asking you is to find a free time on your calendars so we can discuss, suggest, and participate in making the final version of the IPv10 draft and start experimenting its work,
     and once it will work efficiently and we find that it will bring a great value to the Internet, it can be standardized by the IETF.
     
    I’m not in rush in this sequence of work (maybe you have another sequence as I’m new to the IETF mailing list) but I’m curious to receive comments, suggestions, and modifications that will make a progress and eventually bring a value to
     the Internet.
     
    Thanks for welcoming me,  
     
    Best regards,
     
    Khaled Omar
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status