IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 16 February 2016 18:59 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F76F1B3214 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:59:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y6T5WYJOp9e7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:59:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (x-bolt-wan.smeinc.net [209.135.219.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE191B31F8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:59:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [209.135.209.5]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4709F9C013; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:59:00 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([209.135.209.4]) by localhost (ronin.smeinc.net [209.135.209.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hkoZj58GOchp; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:57:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.2.104] (pool-108-51-128-219.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.128.219]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FEAF9C00F; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:59:00 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <56C358A5.8050103@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:58:59 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <98A3ACCF-E33F-4FF6-8743-D73CD9AB742D@vigilsec.com>
References: <99085F2E3228C28C99AB062A@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <56C267D8.5010505@gmail.com> <56C28F22.1000705@comcast.net> <5C98F1D7A5B5E87C772B7166@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <56C358A5.8050103@comcast.net>
To: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/on9NSUkiKpJxxSov_opaaOPgjEE>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:59:03 -0000

Mike:

> AFAICT from the ISOC website, the ISOC President is a member of the ISOC BOT.   There is no problem with the ISOC board appointing the ISOC president as their representative.  The change would give the ISOC board the same flexibility that the IAB is asking for - a choice over who they send over - rather than mandating it be the ISOC President.

The idea that the ISOC Board could appoint someone other than the ISOC President is not new. See [1]. During the discussion in 2011, it was also suggested that the ISOC President might want the flexibility to appoint a direct report.   The IAOC often gets advice from the ISOC CFO, so this would not be an unreasonable choice.

[1]  https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-kolkman-iasa-ex-officio-membership-01.txt

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email