Re: IETF Slack workspace

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 27 August 2020 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE6B3A12C1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=kwEHQUhq; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=so8w2gr3
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wKX1W5tCvRRf for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E9913A12C0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 13:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 23506 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2020 20:26:30 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=5bd0.5f4816f6.k2008; bh=sKeRrlQGecrHMnlO75B4a2u/mGnWu44EdbpGDmWjXJU=; b=kwEHQUhq8gXsx1QFM24bo66PwzHBU8GtWO+49Fm1AHV1KoCD1yaAY/bKycdnKMtAy0DvkG0zDZqSGXIjLHi6VMInqOb4NsCvsLKEtzpVLooVvkaVJxhqfADrIVwtJm8+Xtdz63Go7pJ49b0dsBjvcWvtiu28Mrmjn29tD9zO19J57HDlC2Iy3Fikq90G2Fwk3geMf9jqj+LwtGsfBIKIxUuxU9ZgUE3HGAlybguW9bq85HbCcfQ2VOLPAdL94EA/UtTVB1rw3K/oyNl+AUbjPV2/qW3V+LfW5h9S8ymvop7T8nnN5Jshj/3dhfhVqCMpoHAqctZ9vJ8axBbiza3hJw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=5bd0.5f4816f6.k2008; bh=sKeRrlQGecrHMnlO75B4a2u/mGnWu44EdbpGDmWjXJU=; b=so8w2gr3R//f7Hj3nh0HwuB4Z31jFn+sfiWN51rx04ZmOCGHsS3lHeAo+sV6yj/r92DyNbrErOUpTod1kFdUx0VL1q/K7JaRyX7O9RqitF5vXfm4QWPL50D0/6peXWxBgb7LqxY2YbiuOxqEjmZ5c4c9yDMjim+8O3C1aO+6F7vDk4u0x0laOOs4dIa1lq6oJ4EE05ky5NW7mXgAiiMvYu7mTnS5HuvpMo4cDN30LgH7rUIQMeKlzFsSxoaORZPevzIt0/G3M7syYiqJ8RzEKPVHH4CeF++7u84cXb3C5BqalhScdmmlSx2DZyryJAXtBhL4YjHo+0qGrxdN8fqaeA==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 27 Aug 2020 20:26:30 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id C37F01F36848; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 16:26:29 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 16:26:29 -0400
Message-Id: <20200827202629.C37F01F36848@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: rsk@gsp.org
Subject: Re: IETF Slack workspace
In-Reply-To: <20200827185555.GA18167@gsp.org>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/oof4l8FUjWKbKGvOTr6fHKZghss>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:26:33 -0000

In article <20200827185555.GA18167@gsp.org> you write:
>On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 05:15:20AM +1200, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> The very first thing that this web site does is ask for an email address.
>> 
>> What assurances do we have about what ???Slack, inc.??? will (or will not) do with these email addresses?
>
>The answer is "none whatsoever" since they can change their policies at will.

It's an experiment. If it turns out to be useful I expect the data
retention issues will be one of the things we consider going forward.

R's,
John