IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 05 March 2015 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA33A1A1AE6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 08:49:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y6Ew8BrPPvCJ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 08:49:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E891A1BA4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 08:43:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C65B2CEE1; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 18:43:41 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GtaZEOYNcFvW; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 18:43:40 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66CF2CED4; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 18:43:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_64B6B6AC-9165-4A5E-B465-FE13042B4F46"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <6056F80B-2188-4E52-AE18-35E84BA98147@vpnc.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 18:43:39 +0200
Message-Id: <D205D042-1285-46D5-B9A1-E732B23A8861@piuha.net>
References: <20140520204238.21772.64347.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <500031A0-DF45-409E-AACB-F79C32032E38@viagenie.ca> <4B545BEB-EA0E-4BA8-A45E-15AF12CDB1EC@piuha.net> <20150305044122.4185F2AEEC2D@rock.dv.isc.org> <EC564286-9A5E-4702-A8ED-B2C8E404E68A@piuha.net> <6056F80B-2188-4E52-AE18-35E84BA98147@vpnc.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/osh2a3Ef62V-e3KRHTLSSmliTPg>
Cc: IAB <iab@iab.org>, IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 16:49:31 -0000

> EDNS0 very clearly falls under "best practices": no one can deny that. So, to some extent, the expectation is already on the root server operators to use EDNS0. It's not clear if the IETF saying "here's a thing we insist on" will help the cause.

Seems reasonable. Thanks.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email