IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email author (was - Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 04 November 2016 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1E81296B6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 14:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jmg7V07MRZ4j for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 14:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x230.google.com (mail-qk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD8BC1296B3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 14:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id x190so112048775qkb.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 14:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=IiF7gAu7laWzkCEwUTUeD5nNjTImY6IKTu7nfrtZfDc=; b=XtVD0AMes1sVUj94wjgsFkIe1K1DGa94nIjnayYqMAwQjzAp28O4Iix+LZYFLWI2KQ bAyr7a/dA2h3d79jY4ygdHhGQmJVVT2rtVLWHBLkdvQuF7f9DLS9pmluB73fEf7eeZbc kVACAgHiL8FJv2GITObK8/Tg5bh25Wzjt9AXQ++s6VAE8kt5WJthXXvfWv9iOd5TQw52 w+Qc9Xt0TxmYg0YUf1RxBs40upfOuAxgvFgkCsYLnVl4uxByvujOEcxoQbz0v1mZUSyo Gc4g73a6wetvE5k1Qr2GV11jhveoXzTN1CrUIpyOaClsjCcqJT2ux+82mUKjeXX8t2/n XMDQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=IiF7gAu7laWzkCEwUTUeD5nNjTImY6IKTu7nfrtZfDc=; b=mJfm4vJzdy9VkurLxionHzoK3iABYbmIrnILBvnCi+6y3APQ3u4TgLSNMrZMvt8nbu qHQvrJVGJNCiffnrhzrT0E6/NkE+9QJO9tRcy3bS/Fq/2kAePok6cp2fEiKQXuz/rEII gzYqvVh5XaIF44LIoWKfCgzs9nYjqskuXDfkF+eUUKctx/DIpUCERZ0Z1k2QyeEvQZQO DiebHvA1xvaGVwLdKd0n4gz90cT3ZxbIIC/0+s8RroMYVZV6VIGq92zbAjvIS/7TOfGt KWq7n6483WHEupdqmwUWENLFDs7anPsyBy2LPOy/Q6O4D94imLSTUXNM5er1+ploxWWp UwJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvc7JP12zU1Ao2zMadmzGNNV7zZBgAkWsmP6Cf/myihtINVodCKQRsCFfQq+mSlQvg==
X-Received: by 10.55.168.139 with SMTP id r133mr16923595qke.160.1478294553009; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 14:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.20.146] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 73sm8707912qky.2.2016.11.04.14.22.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Nov 2016 14:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <5FA03832-D38F-47F2-B974-7C903C7513FD@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_65898BB7-E75F-4512-8252-CC4B1FF6D69F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email author (was - Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC)
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 17:22:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CO2PR00MB0103566D260F9BFEC7166C9B96A20@CO2PR00MB0103.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
To: Terry Zink <tzink@exchange.microsoft.com>
References: <678C2FBA-A661-4556-A300-5C08562B5F8A@iii.ca> <29429.1478113235@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CABa8R6vHdt75NFKW3s6xOzLcq=jmVAHDPX0tjLRdGpYSTP2cYA@mail.gmail.com> <33b100ac-c035-8b49-22e1-edbe47f41919@dcrocker.net> <CABa8R6u7WbbeXzkhkNM46RYtMSw7V9FT2m_LvKLHaFDvF3cw3A@mail.gmail.com> <CO2PR00MB0103566D260F9BFEC7166C9B96A20@CO2PR00MB0103.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/otaNZuWEiPChCKDHdBVNkFaoUok>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 21:22:38 -0000

On Nov 4, 2016, at 4:21 PM, Terry Zink <tzink@exchange.microsoft.com> wrote:
> And if there were something like this in other headers that retains the original senders:
>  
> Reply-To: originalSender@example.com <mailto:originalSender@example.com>
> Sender: dmarc <dmarc-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:dmarc-bounces@ietf.org>>
> 

I don’t think this is quite right—I think the Reply-To needs to include all of the senders or else every reply will be an off-list reply (would cut down on noise, admittedly).   Otherwise this would be a great solution.   But because of the way it interacts with MUAs, I do not think it would work in a way that doesn’t violate the principle of least surprise.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email