IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Enough DMARC whinging

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Thu, 01 May 2014 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6271A08F2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 May 2014 08:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WGrtjUZ1dGAs for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 May 2014 08:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x233.google.com (mail-qc0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F4A1A08D0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 May 2014 08:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id x3so155496qcv.24 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 May 2014 08:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=wTslf5drEIFPULjrBxioro4PkStUBivfR3hugpAL79E=; b=YdhsZ2S1AE0rpLClLE7bn9hE7eDoq5YSyJn8dhoGJYu7k7TIuxjbX1yXNtkrW4/6/8 8liVaaBL6wZWRYxdKGR2TlzpZGEV9VTTcCnjxoqmC2rIUSEPeGAevZViFXx1YKkFBD9h SKxpTxo/0SbacK2KzNcrCxWud5X7vjIW328lsc9Oc1UU77ya92z/SosOTVbtfcvucHAv gEYmxl+cIyUV7KGGfj3pt295t932buKU8E6ZOsnR3/Fo9glx4HcqGUInNbxd+ccfGNrZ 10hoYoOsrEtMH8V14Qr6y2pAxiJOWQenVl4CSfRwyxqYVGYYTs63KwUPqRO+9FUZ5Anw dvTw==
X-Received: by 10.224.131.132 with SMTP id x4mr14175903qas.97.1398956844389; Thu, 01 May 2014 08:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.205.69 with HTTP; Thu, 1 May 2014 08:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwiXoW3p5uCmML4kAWXnbrrAnSCK9x5U2qeHJdVgR2r_Gg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMm+Lwh0Sc2wtvjEAjOMi4emDzyF4JWmmzYr5QEFcmyoKtkTAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU0i1Ppc-nMeWL-ipms4E4b0wpsSRZdLG+2YhujPgH-ZPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwikJhO5R6UqWx8qUswMptgTw_wF6E6_9Ok=SRYTBChYgA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU3scwm=j2BJ6jq4k5zRQPkXOVOR1UscQqZZ8tG5HEZTwQ@mail.gmail.com> <536113B1.5070309@bbiw.net> <CAMm+LwiXoW3p5uCmML4kAWXnbrrAnSCK9x5U2qeHJdVgR2r_Gg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 11:07:04 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU2uVtv84-P=aEBhvU_xyBo6LktnpcQuWmx18_e6FgyjUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Enough DMARC whinging
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2dd1cc4194904f858058a"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ovVe6MUdbtJd4fT763p6Cv6Ve3s
Cc: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 15:07:28 -0000

Phillip,

And to the other conversations, we are talking about draft- here. And
> that isn't the same as standard. In fact one of the requirements for
> being granted standard would be to come up with answers to these
> issues.
>

I could not agree with you more, EXCEPT in this case major service
providers (Yahoo, AOL, etc.) are already treating it as a standard, have
implemented it, and people are feeling the pain as a result (and not just
their users, since it's the recipients and mail list managers that are most
affected, not the senders).

Cheers,
Andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email