IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] Apps Directorate Review of draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update-05

Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> Sun, 03 June 2012 04:54 UTC

Return-Path: <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C24C21F848A; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 21:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oc0xjAjGOSAI; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 21:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944BE21F8466; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 21:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by dacx6 with SMTP id x6so4350273dac.31 for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:content-type:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=SW8hKCbAQgq3FmuGaCh+kPbttGlsBCtrkCRMo3sbY+Q=; b=rfh+j1fhkn/UQjPKIUGY4adFK/7MyusW7H68QgCgrqR7q+mc1hhhy8DBYHs68vm15E 1riNaXtM3F4DzWshYzO5oUCBdlN6MOlAFnPzho6QhLJ3S4Vzn2aSbfBJkc9HXE0dECUP /CDc2Bbg71aBfT/yn4sdiKg4DkO6wevXuepTFgiQRAgjz3dNFoAzEqX0AlO3tVVdrWSr FlcNdMUQyiktlDJdvkamyvqxxq5KBkVsbfvVdzzbcmnEBN/v94TNOXtmFSnpZXkGK+FH UOIZ5J6raVNcvqf98+KHvXp+Az0bN3QgiCqUkNFoyI+UwvI2FzoARxwFRZLOym+lBTYO u/cQ==
Received: by 10.68.219.162 with SMTP id pp2mr25898071pbc.85.1338699241397; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.99] (ppp-58-11-241-69.revip2.asianet.co.th. [58.11.241.69]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id iv8sm326444pbc.53.2012.06.02.21.53.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1338699237.5620.3.camel@gwz-laptop>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Apps Directorate Review of draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update-05
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
To: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 11:53:57 +0700
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1206022113110.17026@shell4.bayarea.net>
References: <4FCA0E7F.7020109@cisco.com> <ACEDFEC8-1525-47B0-92D8-FB7CB1D22A0C@isi.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1206022113110.17026@shell4.bayarea.net>
Organization: Network Zen
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, Apps Discussion <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 04:54:02 -0000

On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 21:21 -0700, C. M. Heard wrote:

...

> > > In Section 6.1:
> > > 
> > > 
> > >>    Datagram de-duplication can be accomplished using hash-based
> > >>    duplicate detection for cases where the ID field is absent.
> > >> 
> > > 
> > > Under what circumstances would the ID field be absent?
> > 
> > Replace "absent" with "known not unique".
> 
> Better, I think, would be "not known to be unique".

Except that the two are not semantically equivalent.

...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email