Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Wed, 16 May 2012 14:32 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E09121F8504 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 May 2012 07:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E0m4vFd3kyEF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 May 2012 07:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5BB21F8503 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 May 2012 07:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.9.2] (md02736d0.tmodns.net [208.54.39.208]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q4GEVv4g018329 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 16 May 2012 07:31:59 -0700
Message-ID: <4FB3BA59.2010801@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 07:31:53 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case
References: <562A61B995B24BD854A4D154@[192.168.0.2]> <m2boloci9k.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2boloci9k.wl%randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Wed, 16 May 2012 07:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:32:03 -0000

On 5/16/2012 7:28 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> can != may
>
> one is ability, the other permission


When we were first taught English grammar, yes.  Today, not so much.

Actually pretty much never.  In modern usage, the distinction has been lost.

d/
-- 
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net