Re: Fwd: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment
Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 06 June 2025 08:35 UTC
Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702DE31A886D for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 01:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9zpSYYmSyOT6 for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 01:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF91B31A885C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 01:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5efe8d9ebdfso3354434a12.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Jun 2025 01:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1749198940; x=1749803740; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=umMctys7DiQBuXjvYea9bWT+IASkqRmSRDAPFx5zPSw=; b=JDDjqjjgUG8SsJ2ejTTmixWUK3lb6sQSqjNh6GUFMm2PMZaALVAUGyWF77LpDXi126 JafHEeFiS7KU2mpeg4rApzvyXyNHwfb00CzxJu55FSNuULUaoKgcXGjrmc1hEN4n1al2 botpwA1mNSbHGS/398m0AOskXz/xmJUKA0dJ6timiWjQYxh0zalv44IJL/LQia0UOyl1 7FGg/Tjtl6wOYqkqMoORrSuRdRR0+s8V/Qc0U7HDrSdorb9HYBQAlFBhPghFyQj9ZSvM zpLtsv/DEvuVoxmkDe1Th5bcaMdZ6E+MBWFag8LBnL6Tby1hauD/erS6lemHy5208hRc ZWTA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1749198940; x=1749803740; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=umMctys7DiQBuXjvYea9bWT+IASkqRmSRDAPFx5zPSw=; b=ZoFNxA6gQ+3MRyuEWkFB3338v3FOyHPrLhfsojEP38/cvhMn1R+DYSg4T52ctnfxbs f6+3Rccl7sOonLwjq1J5/GQRbh6bCIlrSzJZ0k4VYNCowoy6wgsnIHRVE4frV6DHgLHn ISunQMge8yTOenu2v8eWqirqQRne3dAf1vP7kA2SIqYtmxHRMhLBkbvzSCEr/hx633Lk vTV7p80vojB+ZuPloGU6ElOtnembYrkU/DV92J2rTc+ZfMhzk2VT6FnhB+ghajStBYNu 9vyqQpyGkPL1sqivVvkAQgpw1pUCc/IeynmWsYfZI491HcbkVEv0aBKADRywEeCqQnAz AhHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxSMV9angI33CP7NHvdbLRmMFrvxxhfhjR14FcC1yrGET44/xHu N6BsP1xdhElkkW6myemqF0INpNR03kDbH1P6EKYsyXM2d8JFIbWYIMpYZiWOWaDY9yjRfJ0lF1T L8NdV2Xw4RTC3SFh5U08Vj0jXTKR1XjCmgg==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvVHNCaPLfEjCt4TQX0dZ42GKbrYyRBWQMUag9B8vjuZIaWOu3tCB3eLcjWI04 hKb8BJsIU+CAd0/gdp3mIw6lbdr4t/+R9Kp/FGMPsdi3Uo1hGq2vETXWsLdrRgwZkKQ4muyMQLU 7DstvMgg4KGnk7veuIZ+rrh+Q0qQ3IpTt92RxUrxG5YqkU
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHwsTsWbxyuIX6/BbIXCiXytyAEONvV7tcFvDqYXuFznDQhH0eT+6P5UIt5AaT8MRCrHK9XgHD65rIOd5fCR80=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1ed5:b0:607:1c0a:9369 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-607734170d4mr2049434a12.2.1749198939731; Fri, 06 Jun 2025 01:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0E13A03E-3B81-4C9C-976E-B8C68810B486@ietf.org> <CA+9kkMBoDhQq4GROSYQ0AjJ3Um-7XsL6D8s+R+rRDkX8fv-NnA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMA__=wsDz1w=y5OaG1-aD5TvsMDiPSG+Z-60MYQwrO2GQ@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20250605233810.0ac03900@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20250605233810.0ac03900@elandnews.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2025 09:35:13 +0100
X-Gm-Features: AX0GCFu0DZp1YD1MK0Kz6oi7rrUgzNaDpxaukvLWOhrqZqrzlbj8XQHqcsdD3nA
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMAsD2Sz+=HCMPVyG5ODc9MkyOns3My4jMfm8=R-Hsz-CQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000071bc2b0636e31da3"
Message-ID-Hash: RCU33FLKNDBXJIN3P6LQ5EVLJMCWPPCG
X-Message-ID-Hash: RCU33FLKNDBXJIN3P6LQ5EVLJMCWPPCG
X-MailFrom: ted.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/p13OROM8t2pBTOU6I_zL_02lslQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>
Howdy, I have not received any at this time, but since the LLC has not met since I posed the questions, I think the timing is reasonable. regards, Ted On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 8:04 AM S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote: > Hi Ted, > At 02:47 AM 23-05-2025, Ted Hardie wrote: > >10-08.pdf . I believe it is very important that the community > >understand the IESG's conclusion here, in addition to the IETF > >LLC's, as the IESG is charged with the standards process and part of > >the risk here is to the standards process. > > There were several questions in the email which you sent about two > weeks ago. I could not find any replies in the mailing list > archives. Did you receive any response to those questions? > > Regards, > S. Moonesamy > >
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Eliot Lear
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Jeffrey Walton
- Fwd: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Fwd: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment S Moonesamy
- Re: Fwd: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Jay Daley
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Jay Daley
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Rob Sayre
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment IETF Executive Director
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment John C Klensin
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Corinne Cath
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Jay Daley
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment John Levine
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Jay Daley
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie