Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 23 February 2015 13:08 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9381A1A8F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 05:08:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gYTwmhJCSHQK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 05:07:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0946A1A1A9D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 05:07:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3381; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1424696879; x=1425906479; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to; bh=2NCyQgBKHF88uMSjUSkUpqtXVTvQASGilMtIHb5B/w0=; b=ik+H90C6CAYPnYoXp0SSLnfgiOZy5jAQoylaLaCiccgrymXtzcDs4WyK jcaY+Bq36lSO7rIgrX1kyWNt+FFfvLb2C7WW/2X6wbm2GjOOz9c4BJWEW V4woEIzgeVuWJWwfkiz71DD/2epU04TMQKwKGylPetf46OesTkbaOEyJG k=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 486
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ApBgDcJOtU/4cNJK1bgwZSWoMIwA+FcAKBIkMBAQEBAQF8hBABAQQjVRELGAkWBAcCAgkDAgECAUUGAQwGAgEBBYgmDbohhz+QRwEBAQEBAQEDAQEBAQEBARuLE4R1gmiBQwWRMYEuUYIWg0+BU4ULjFUiggIcFIE9PTGCQwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,630,1418083200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="126044634"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Feb 2015 13:07:58 +0000
Received: from [10.24.255.185] ([10.24.255.185]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1ND7uRs027486; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:07:57 GMT
Message-ID: <54EB262A.6080509@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:07:54 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?UGF0cmlrIEbDpGx0c3Ryw7Zt?= <paf@netnod.se>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard
References: <20150127223859.28024.43756.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4257D8A3-0EFE-40E3-B0AD-8E23772B7693@mnot.net> <6F9BB11D-C224-4D7B-A06C-41EACBAAB4B2@netnod.se> <54C9DA42.5040901@cisco.com> <9EB44D8A-278B-42FC-A542-1C182AD43128@netnod.se> <3C46B3A5-5D3A-4A40-A564-21B567E58239@netnod.se>
In-Reply-To: <3C46B3A5-5D3A-4A40-A564-21B567E58239@netnod.se>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IMFpr8fGEX7hmpApg265LG8gP1SXrisFw"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/p3lJIvy104m48xYo00ON4_rzAlk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:08:00 -0000

I'm also sorry for not commenting earlier in thread.  My point was
informational, and not an issue.  However, what you describe below seems
appropriate.

Eliot


On 2/23/15 2:04 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> All,
>
>
> Due to a mistake from my side, the new version I have been hacking in based on comments coming back during the still open last call was posted the other day. I am sorry for that and my apologies for people being confused.
>
> It was my intention "only" to describe here what I have found so far in comments, so let me summarize in no specific order:
>
> - It is confusing to have a full section called "examples" and then only have one example.
>
> - The registries that existed when the draft was first posted was (only) the ENUM registry, while now we also have a registry for SRV prefixes, and this draft can and should reference both
>
> - The example(s) given should because the draft reference a registry use actual values that are registered.
>
> - As no web browser have implemented lookup for the URI RRType (as far as I know), the example should not be using "homepage" as an example, but something else
>
> - Minor clarifications that mostly are editorial
>
> Some of these, but not all, are already implemented in the prematurely posted version -11 which should not have been posted.
>
> Once again, my apologies. Thanks to Eliot, Mark, Suzanne and Pete for helping me.
>
>    Patrik
>
>> On 29 jan 2015, at 08:05, Patrik Fältström <paf@netnod.se> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 29 jan 2015, at 07:59, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Patrik,
>>>
>>> On this one point:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 1/28/15 9:46 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The RRType is registered and can not be changed.
>>>>
>>>> That said, what can be referred to is a "better" registry for services. IETF do not have a registry for services for SRV. If IETF did, then I would have referenced that registry. I think it is "stupid" to create a new registry.
>>> Stupid or not, it exists.  Go to [1] and select "Service name only".
>>> RFC 6335 updated RFC 2782 on this point[2].
>> Ok, I have been sleeping by the wheel!
>>
>> Mea culpa.
>>
>> Let me come back on this.
>>
>>   Patrik
>>
>>> Eliot
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.iana.org/form/ports-services
>>> [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6335
>>>