Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Sat, 10 January 2015 23:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633461A01C6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 15:27:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GJ3lpA_Zx0Gw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 15:26:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7309F1A0076 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 15:26:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8F02009E; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:32:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id B8A94637FE; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:26:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DECE63745; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:26:57 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: stbryant@cisco.com
Subject: Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY
In-Reply-To: <54B0322F.7090909@cisco.com>
References: <CAL0qLwZk=k-CWLte_ChK9f1kzLwMOTRyi7AwFa8fLjBsextBcA@mail.gmail.com> <9772.1420830216@sandelman.ca> <54B02B51.1070308@cs.tcd.ie> <54B0322F.7090909@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:26:57 -0500
Message-ID: <32500.1420932417@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/p3o9ThJ1M9oqexsLcVn1PvB8ego>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 23:27:00 -0000

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>; wrote:
    > We would have to be careful with the time constants of the filter.

    > Whilst I can see that virtual attendance (which itself would need a
    > criteria beyond my robot logging me onto the sessions) should slow the
    > eligibility decay but should not eliminate it.

If you look at my proposed list of things that would constitute contribution
(a word I used rather than attendance), none of them involved being logged in
remotely. 

    > Some degree of physical presence is needed to properly understand the
    > roles of those being selected and the culture and operation of an
    > important part of the IETF.

That's why you have to BECOME eligible by being physically present.

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [