IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG Review: NETCONF Data Modeling Language (netmod)

Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net> Wed, 23 April 2008 04:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287273A6C00; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC593A6C00; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o9FyZP-FMIxK; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.songbird.com (mail.songbird.com [208.184.79.10]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86A53A686B; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.4] (adsl-67-127-190-96.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.127.190.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m3N430Mg005482 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:03:01 -0700
Message-ID: <480EB52A.9070308@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:03:54 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
Subject: Re: WG Review: NETCONF Data Modeling Language (netmod)
References: <20080422211401.303175081A@romeo.rtfm.com> <NIEJLKBACMDODCGLGOCNCEGOEMAA.bertietf@bwijnen.net> <20080422215641.09FD05081A@romeo.rtfm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080422215641.09FD05081A@romeo.rtfm.com>
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird: Clean
X-Songbird-From: dhc2@dcrocker.net
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org


Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Which is why it is now returned to the broader community for
> additional perspectives from those not already committed to a
> particular path


Are they committed to doing the work?

Do they have their own constituency?

Since the topic is not new, where have they been and why have they not 
developed their own group consensus?

Rather than "perspectives" where are the technical concerns that Bert asked about?

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email