Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Wed, 26 February 2020 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36353A0A14 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 05:11:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3jd5P3Mls19Z for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 05:11:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 165AC3A0A11 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 05:11:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.10] (unknown [181.45.84.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CE0E86BA5; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:11:33 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <PR3P194MB0843ACAE01F33CEC57266A1AAE100@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <EDAE6375-EE0B-4864-9834-C1FBC209D581@sobco.com> <PR3P194MB08431E138262F2A43C1D0621AE100@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <8ADEA0E1-291A-4400-9925-F65A26116372@consulintel.es> <PR3P194MB0843939F3B38426960A66E70AE130@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <D8063303-7DDA-41F8-A63A-C0244E3E9E25@isc.org> <CAJc3aaN_t3BgdOV20jJV=ncYNZqL9VYDO+cTO+tvbjK6c1ci_A@mail.gmail.com> <B298CD63-5A51-40ED-A414-96672646F1C8@consulintel.es> <CAJc3aaPcrP2WeUMCadSWbRp6ATS1HU+NaeBgLOb7Z4C6S1wMmw@mail.gmail.com> <440FD502-B4C8-498D-91B8-339E632304D8@consulintel.es>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <4ae504a2-4a9d-5266-3e44-41f704d1916e@si6networks.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:03:16 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <440FD502-B4C8-498D-91B8-339E632304D8@consulintel.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/p6pJwRjqge5UQYMBHCMBXOBVdA4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 13:11:41 -0000

On 20/2/20 00:59, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> Hi Victor,
> 
> Of course, I see your points and I’m not saying that IETF has nothing to 
> do with that, neither that it applies the same to every possible country 
> case. It was just part of this discussion.
> 
> I’ve worked for a few governments, on this, with more or less success 
> depending on the case, and most of the time is a matter of the right 
> schedule, not saying the existing services should support IPv6 tomorrow, 
> but “new” or “updated” services should do it in a given timing. This was 
> my point 1.
> 
> Regarding 2, I think if a country ban importing or selling IPv4-only 
> products, with a determined time scale (to be studied case by case), is 
> perfectly valid and not impacting global Internet at all. Existing IPv4 
> services can remain. Products in stock can be sold during “n” months, 
> not afterwards.
> 
> Example, SmartTVs without IPv6 could be sold during 6 additional months, 
> not imported anymore after 3 months, etc.

Have e.g. 3G-only mobile phones been banned? Or do users *opt* not to 
buy such phones for a reason? (there might be an implicit message in the 
possible answer to this question).

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492