Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-15.txt> (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) IPv4 and IPv6 Option for a Location Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)) to Proposed Standard

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 27 June 2012 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F60B21F861D; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YtKpY4l9p5jS; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (toccata.fugue.com [204.152.186.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B8F21F861C; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by toccata.fugue.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B5092381615; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:02:16 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-15.txt> (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) IPv4 and IPv6 Option for a Location Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)) to Proposed Standard
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_687B87F2-BB1D-4C83-AB94-CE46AF5A00F2"
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <2C9D555E-C18A-47D3-BB6A-B822B7957ABE@cdt.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:02:14 +0200
Message-Id: <829DAD0D-D6CC-4BDB-A5D9-0B36FE7379BD@fugue.com>
References: <20120531184851.30358.8816.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <ADE21D06-F6A4-4018-A999-6B50EC94F3C7@fugue.com> <3AE0A5BB-E5B7-46A3-A3D6-3F7C8FB84016@cdt.org> <33AFBD35-FDCA-4424-9EB1-1903976085B0@fugue.com> <2C9D555E-C18A-47D3-BB6A-B822B7957ABE@cdt.org>
To: Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:45:25 -0700
Cc: GEOPRIV WG <geopriv@ietf.org>, "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:02:20 -0000

On Jun 27, 2012, at 11:27 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> If we split it into two options, that eliminates the future possibility of supporting multiple URIs per client. So we will need to take this back to the GEOPRIV WG to make sure folks are okay with foreclosing that.

The document already says that multiple URIs aren't valid, doesn't it?