Re: IAOC -- looking for committee volunteers

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 20 July 2016 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B47D12D548 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 06:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TZSFkScLKJS6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 06:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22d.google.com (mail-yw0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29A0712B019 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 06:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id j12so37302481ywb.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 06:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eut5ZOaam7/UIM9DA58Z7/N39yZzIRHzvoDYF5G36X8=; b=mXmmH7WaTzMXHhFSG7qYh0+Go4PsdBppjnCGGafxvzzeWpthDiZ7dMVoZHqQE0JtKj VHSZcg/uqiL2i24pHHV70+SlNa8zp1EzixZ4c23ELDkhVq6eQr6psrKv44eAoKCi6I4Z +C+KUdK0wfR0FZAAZGrjNXraQGE75Vy+Univld5vc07eAOasR11ZaQ3ksiGUkpHIb93g JMeIydPeVkLfrFbGmxkF4S8w0noSVXv4+dxzxMJbA5YzFeSCGT9+aDqp/XRRxk5HLGVV nkkZ/V+jKibQCXqOHXY/ltJDrCceg5yL2YmC60G+ZfUrarJm8sPoyu3XqvhGXs0cHSnM urRg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eut5ZOaam7/UIM9DA58Z7/N39yZzIRHzvoDYF5G36X8=; b=UfS0W3g/rZv72vRI9cMoyAB5Qe1hkOXcdjgl3fbRxsflX2ZToqqdx08N3cx/OzvGgc hpZOnd8coZCwRTaBT/R9co5SpWFa1Sr7srEJxbSkdOmaeLAnm2XVGxOpvD2J9GtVPuYa riAcZE5C7n/4/tHbXfzxCBMhZ8sDHactjjRWmoXg9iVuae+CWGA8mRo11Pn11aRK0ebl Ryhg5veM+FMsC07XQU6uI1rodtj/1bFSFCIEa9zOnEEYe0vzPuKEuH9fb6uPuagNUpgS /VqCIndgNbPLaKb5ZQqePAnB2QTKFraDBsJS1pj8ccR/9W4sMBxZlw4lur+dLnTax4ZF S34Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIN37pxmgTyk/L3gHVbRReHaQw3W9q/4Y9KUZhe4xXze2mbm9SNXNzMzCHAkc73oNCrOYbgPFv92FVBdA==
X-Received: by 10.129.83.67 with SMTP id h64mr11255841ywb.276.1469019766346; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 06:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.152.13 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 06:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <79aa8559-f9e4-0538-26ac-bbdbb5b7d7eb@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <20160718132715.24782.50243.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <14b99269-9999-dc44-c42c-87b228f4f92b@nostrum.com> <79aa8559-f9e4-0538-26ac-bbdbb5b7d7eb@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:02:07 +0200
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPRC0r7nPoXKJbbdPq9V4MY+Zfn-Xy-1cymtwdAXE4eBA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IAOC -- looking for committee volunteers
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114d8af0578a66053810d1bd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/pAmvAk3hXQ7nSAw4CHzta73UQFc>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:02:51 -0000

In general I agree with Adam and Stephen.

In particular, it seems especially important that issues like venue
selection which implicate people's individual interests (travel, safety,
etc.) be made by a diverse group.

-Ekr

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
wrote:

>
>
> On 20/07/16 12:52, Adam Roach wrote:
> > I think it's great that we're drawing community members into the IAOC
> > discussions.
>
> Fully agree.
>
> > Also, while I understand that it's something of a dead horse, I think
> > one of the things that the IETF 100 discussions threw into relief is
> > that the existing committees are quite homogeneous
>
> FWIW, I agree that diversity in many dimensions ought be a factor
> that whoever adds folks to these subcommittees.
>
> S.
>
>