obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 28 October 2013 14:00 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C620021F9EFB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 07:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.838, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EG4NfIMhbmx7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 07:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB2B11E8278 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 07:00:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MPlMc-1VefFF2q1K-0054MB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:00:23 +0100
Message-ID: <526E6DF4.4030509@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:00:20 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20131027115007.07e32210@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20131027115007.07e32210@elandnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ZXVOGkTI2j3w1GEu/Av7gTS8tPAtUU0a75sXjnjU8mwRepRiiYl 50rMLyqOpTNmPkMebPTCK1vmGmitQX0AWT+lQ/iXHJtcBadH/fa1TCxjzAVmWKRaQTMzkqb D1vgn+qzzAlH7o7IBxnVZxBS4kn7UwJdEkfV2eHh+Ry/lUbRQgu9aMm0EYN28U8jz0YphIz tDpOgt9wn2RHxTJe1EnGA==
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:00:55 -0000
On 2013-10-28 09:07, S Moonesamy wrote: > ... > In Section 7.1.1: > > "The preferred format is a fixed-length and single-zone subset of > the date and time specification used by the Internet Message Format > [RFC5322]" > > The ABNF imports obs-date from RFC 5322. "GMT" is defined in "obs-zone" > (see RFC 5322). There is the following in the section: > > "For example, messages are occasionally forwarded over HTTP from a > non-HTTP source that might generate any of the date and time > specifications defined by the Internet Message Format." > > I listed this as a minor issue. I am not suggesting any change as "GMT" > is used in other header fields. I'll defer to the HTTPbis Working Group > as to whether there should be a note about "GMT" with an explanation > that although "GMT" is deprecated the use is widespread. > ... Actually, HTTPbis has its own obs-date: obs-date = rfc850-date / asctime-date <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24.html#rfc.section.7.1.1.1> So there doesn't seem to be an issue here. Best regards, Julian
- APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics… S Moonesamy
- obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of d… Julian Reschke
- Re: obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review … John C Klensin
- Re: obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review … Julian Reschke
- IANA issues, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-ht… Julian Reschke
- content inspection in absence of media type, was:… Julian Reschke
- Re: obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review … John C Klensin
- Re: content inspection in absence of media type, … S Moonesamy
- Re: content inspection in absence of media type, … Julian Reschke
- Re: obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review … Amos Jeffries
- Re: content inspection in absence of media type, … Barry Leiba
- Re: IANA issues, was: APPSDIR review of draft-iet… S Moonesamy
- Re: obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review,… S Moonesamy
- Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence … Martin J. Dürst
- Re: obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review … Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence … Julian Reschke
- Re: content inspection in absence of media type, … S Moonesamy
- Re: IANA issues, was: APPSDIR review of draft-iet… Julian Reschke
- Re: content inspection in absence of media type, … Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence … Martin J. Dürst
- Re: content inspection in absence of media type, … S Moonesamy
- RE: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence … Larry Masinter
- Re: [apps-discuss] content inspection in absence … Henry S. Thompson