IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv10.

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 12 November 2016 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A52129665; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:04:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wG1nw3xsZYDy; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:04:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22f.google.com (mail-pf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16BEB12942F; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:04:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id d2so20200016pfd.0; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:04:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d1Zl6zvsLIKPnx3xyJQWh+gE7IeoYuQSUMDNoB+rF/0=; b=DXlz1vDnCKX8R3U0+cRPIsiTzce9EJADwmShDuE1FKWJ0qJHBD0mh4tqBt6aMvXo2u ebnXB/JxA6vsxK07/FUxuyS8mq+FpR94x3tyT28SGBoCqnJIu3ABkY/d5oTUejqsF+1f TvxmhLOSt/p2ouAtIc1DzypTF4hjpkySQNzO+iLqwV3pHGQrqHkMlucsGHgUkJRnmKJf xbkaTd+RxDXR6RxppSqYZxTqu0HQWHeZ8nH5EpFQfRKO1DV/5HP10ON0y1xcqkW8AlJU YWW4ZDqtboBHYcWaqCU+tnWG7y+HkzlYwEDtVvh7qDcI1WzOo56BiPmkze7L/NYuzoCh VNTQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=d1Zl6zvsLIKPnx3xyJQWh+gE7IeoYuQSUMDNoB+rF/0=; b=MmSgvxZ1ZD4FUyPr/8PolPW3zIAuxhiPAbXVwvsRkwUSIfQIi/+3Upb51PHA6EDxdR EV5aOb4XfG3Xu/oUVGhJ3KG0wuP99UbryZh879pIKTCzWeE685qj/6kEs1p2yHKu3VRT CrWzX42m0lz2UsE/wbjQIM+RsD9dJqAuYvSwwv5SRy2GzpGs29okorsT8JKyECJNUJdZ Q19Evsd997yWq6hXAcnEeWJZlLT6qSv7/7klHlpe4KC7x0fB39rlIEK2bF6WJ792tEeB uzjXcUsqwQRTZEZQfa/v5vzmLj9e/WwFkV/EMJXfjMKn7XSd+LeM2AWP1DDEW1CWmMf7 RyWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdzEk4rjqnsyxdzy+YN1Zjpzjd5PcYCRo5thqYhCF9jyKxz/l9OTpPruCgQHCAt1w==
X-Received: by 10.99.3.202 with SMTP id 193mr55844440pgd.157.1478981057711; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:04:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] (232.21.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [123.255.21.232]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d15sm24164255pfl.46.2016.11.12.12.04.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:04:17 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: IPv10.
To: "Latif LADID [IPv6-based Internet]" <latif@ladid.lu>, 'Randy Bush' <randy@psg.com>
References: <HE1PR04MB1449514D421EAC698335EE99BDBB0@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <37c3bc17-daa1-cac0-3848-5eb97350b87c@kit.edu> <m260ntlcra.wl-randy@psg.com> <656b8d28-6632-ddb3-34d4-5468a778cae2@gmail.com> <0a9b01d23cb4$dd1d4af0$9757e0d0$@ladid.lu>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <03756093-ddd1-e232-d329-dd563d4f06c2@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 09:04:12 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0a9b01d23cb4$dd1d4af0$9757e0d0$@ladid.lu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/pHywtJ9S3TdBZhcvwO2T0tGHxoQ>
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 20:04:20 -0000

Hi Latif,

On 12/11/2016 20:17, Latif LADID [IPv6-based Internet] wrote:
> Jon Postel will swizel in his grave if v10 is not assigned by IANA first.
> Let's not confuse the market. A working group at ETSI has been formed 6
> months ago called NGP ( Next Gereation Protocols) lashing at v4 and v6 to
> invent a new one.  

How incredibly foolish of them.

   Brian

> Also the ITU will jump on this one to occupy the v10
> space :-)
> 
> Latif
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
> Sent: 12 November 2016 02:43
> To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
> Cc: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>; ipv6@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: IPv10.
> 
> On 12/11/2016 14:15, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> Right now it seems that you have got a solution proposal for a 
>>> problem, that is IMHO not very clearly described.
>>
>> how about ipv4 and ipv6 are incompatible on the wire and this has 
>> created a multi-decade ipv6 charlie foxtrot?
> 
> Yes, I suggest mentioning that to Vint, Bob and a few others in 1977, so
> that they can design IPv4 with extensible addresses. People in
> 2016 will be grateful.
> 
>    Brian
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email