Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Wed, 05 April 2017 11:24 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9A2129452 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 04:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OkCgqvs5JfJq for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 04:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22c.google.com (mail-wr0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C5B61201F8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 04:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id w43so9375040wrb.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 04:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CGrpxd5BVtV7DzXZuOmXrPQssQsAvWSKDMwbw8pHfio=; b=Q/ZeW/7tMk91dmQlIPbpZPcl7/pAhWuEL8AJy53G+VMGZdZfZxbwSiIO7/QOlBlWT5 VRqYYmzOgr3ZrX8SRma42kxd5FjOJPI4ZNnEZZ2U6+GgYxqTmLfcx5cowoueSFBG/iCB bdPLxQHOz+MPUUiUVOopsaCG7yudmbeV33QVV+MfLDyg1I2/Odj7hD+6VsK+GkoNDw5T bsjoyBJjPKe7HhN5wr3WlCJI+ne72SRONqVOpQoq6pVxEgyPeDhUXO7gVDw8je9Y7LCF 9SzewWMY/M7EVeB2KBfw7G9xRp4+p8no1NScpTL1hHDa8CNCFkAGuFo8qUlJ4hCLz7+z ursA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CGrpxd5BVtV7DzXZuOmXrPQssQsAvWSKDMwbw8pHfio=; b=cIyWaYnI6tzNGdJVA40MqgkRECF0Bl62utjAa8HS2jYLJNySBUtFQElBhCJPBNGbBa oThdFrolnGAw9Erhcj2QQ9895h6APavxWhm8f4qnmpW3zI0yJOECwe5+xARddeWeMtRS YaCm+DGIRPQ3ioFT0tDf93rTvqhihG9zGwLkk7djmxYrTZDB/P7lRrFXuEHF1rcdGFed CAR6aqTIdrt/OlPq50rQekZbcvzaRNiTqemmCGanAG5qjCTgwRDuP2hWgGTXvhLHgKM1 dtDOZrLvFs0mgeGUDQeTeqjSmVUmfd2lpDFPiiRCYZhHV708n5b/0EvqApUPL4VIZtt1 qNHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3NSKRYOBz+mjXTVInA/tzzxOy39Bt0GlaIfvvydMSdYXtwzZ8z2k51w1cmKdWtjw==
X-Received: by 10.223.168.120 with SMTP id l111mr25623074wrc.173.1491391437638; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 04:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o15sm25801106wra.61.2017.04.05.04.23.56 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Apr 2017 04:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
References: <149096990336.4276.3480662759931758139.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9fee9874-1306-07a2-a84a-4e09381a5336@cisco.com> <E67FDB14-9895-48E0-A334-167172D322DB@nohats.ca> <20170403152624.GA11714@gsp.org> <93404c29-78ba-ff9b-9170-f5f2a5389a31@gmail.com> <E068F01A-B720-4E7A-A60F-AA5BDA22D535@consulintel.es> <20170404181505.GA4004@localhost> <CAAQiQRcvu-BfBA_NEqZwXsHEn6ujpa2=w7P5Vu2f6GLXjKqkcA@mail.gmail.com> <20170404202446.GB4004@localhost> <20170404211526.GA25253@gsp.org> <20170404221912.GD4004@localhost>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8b83a115-437f-dd02-4a22-1fc0d45b301d@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:23:56 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170404221912.GD4004@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/pKoYwryVpG5xNdhVawjmTMfg42Q>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:24:01 -0000


On 04/04/2017 23:19, Nico Williams wrote:
> If a country starts demanding access to and passwords for every
> visitor's every device

.. hopefully they will accept a list of possible passwords plus password 
recovery as an answer, because for anything that I rarely use such as 
facebook, I work my way down a list of possible passwords and more often 
than not end up using password recovery.

Stewart