IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest"mailing list])

Scott Brim <swb@employees.org> Tue, 10 February 2009 01:22 UTC

Return-Path: <swb@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8442C28C2DD for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:22:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.051, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vh6yjNkI8Jst for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:22:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F6F28C2DF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:21:26 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,182,1233532800"; d="scan'208";a="36483606"
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Feb 2009 01:21:28 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n1A1LSQn008670 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:21:28 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1A1LSnC011729 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:21:28 GMT
Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:21:28 -0500
Received: from cisco.com ([64.102.8.172]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:21:28 -0500
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:21:23 -0500
From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: It's time for some new steps (was: [Welcome to the "Ietf-honest"mailing list])
Message-ID: <20090210012123.GL920@cisco.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <4990CC68.2000200@dcrocker.net> <001d01c98b19$a361aae0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <001d01c98b19$a361aae0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Feb 2009 01:21:28.0178 (UTC) FILETIME=[E5C20520:01C98B1D]
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=swb@employees.org; dkim=neutral
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:22:25 -0000

Excerpts from Randy Presuhn on Mon, Feb 09, 2009 04:50:57PM -0800:
> > Normally, I advocate entirely ignoring silliness, but the current version of it 
> > is more than silly.
> 
> Particularly since mail to the -request address bounces, and
> using the web interface to unsubscribe apparently has no effect.

worked for me ... but enough on this.

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status