IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Tue, 07 August 2012 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727DC11E80F0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 14:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.735
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.735 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.532, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iko1e5kUEvEx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 14:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A196211E80D2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 14:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q77LuXIE016397 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 22:56:33 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk q77LuXIE016397
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=200903; t=1344376593; bh=Hx90psmDcP/5xa3BuarHsVEUExU=; h=Subject:References:From:In-Reply-To:Date:To:Mime-Version; b=rAU7yoMFpB4loVzZINDLe5gNcnJZWFuMzlp5kc3Pp8XFSYFQ7mmzmu98dCHbcWHbv pdgKQ9jUosfVa8dhYdnuWH86g7XAWSxc9UyAB4YpVCCFetghIOGeW4L83Bc1UyqtKC qxLAQ1hYRnOIBOv0b0NCk/Qazx4q24DI3B+9jIzM=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk ([2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:401]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:68da]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id o76MuX0430609196s0 ret-id none; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:56:33 +0100
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (host213-123-213-183.in-addr.btopenworld.com [213.123.213.183]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q77LtBC6028976 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 22:55:12 +0100
Subject: Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)
References: <31BCE4DE825B3F4D9E452EFBBD3F1EF2834A0516@PACDCEXMB01.cable.comcast.com> <502169E9.9020009@dcrocker.net> <AC30AAA7-8634-4851-86CC-6F64095BB600@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206)
In-Reply-To: <502169E9.9020009@dcrocker.net>
Message-ID: <EMEW3|0ebd669a4eccc2cca00daf1beb84ed50o76MuX03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|AC30AAA7-8634-4851-86CC-6F64095BB600@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:55:20 +0100
To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=o76MuX043060919600; tid=o76MuX0430609196s0; client=relay,forged,no_ptr,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=1:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: q77LuXIE016397
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 21:56:36 -0000

Hi,

My top three repeat venues would be Prague, Minneapolis and Vancouver.  Great meeting venues, with everything you need nearby.

My least favoured venues have been Dublin, Vienna and Maastricht.

Of course, you have to experiment to find good repeat venues...

Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email