IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board

ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com Thu, 19 February 2009 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037F128C0FE for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:24:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tvsU1QRnFEw2 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:24:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F073A6B59 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:24:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01N5O8RWG88G010TWA@mauve.mrochek.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:24:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01N5NPSMNDK000007A@mauve.mrochek.com> (original mail from NED@mauve.mrochek.com) for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:24:08 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:23:47 -0800
From: ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com
Subject: Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:20:54 +0000" <20090219102054.10340.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Message-id: <01N5O8RTHWDK00007A@mauve.mrochek.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <20090218022441.GA3600@mini-me.lan> <20090219102054.10340.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:24:04 -0000

> >So you've done the equivalent of submit Windows source code and assume
> >that it can be ported to a Unix system "left as an exercise to the
> >reader"....  care to give a detailed suggestion about *how* it could
> >be revised to work with the IETF's more open procedures, and still be
> >useful in terms of meeting your stated goals?

> I wasn't kidding when I said submit a draft.

Neither was I.

> I realize that the chances of a significant change to the IETF's IPR
> policy are pretty slim, but if we find nobody finds it important
> enough to spend an hour throwing together a draft describing what he
> thinks we should do, we can stop now.

+1

				Ned

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status