IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed Update to Note Well

Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org> Fri, 22 June 2012 17:07 UTC

Return-Path: <stewe@stewe.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E1621F8773; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i4-qhrfi73tt; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from db3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (db3ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9869721F858F; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:07:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail98-db3-R.bigfish.com (10.3.81.242) by DB3EHSOBE005.bigfish.com (10.3.84.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:05:38 +0000
Received: from mail98-db3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail98-db3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA67E4803EA; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:05:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.133; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0710HT002.namprd07.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -1
X-BigFish: PS-1(zzbb2dI98dI9371I1432Izz1202h1082kzzz2fh2a8h668h839h944he5bhf0ah)
Received-SPF: pass (mail98-db3: domain of stewe.org designates 157.56.240.133 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.133; envelope-from=stewe@stewe.org; helo=BL2PRD0710HT002.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
Received: from mail98-db3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail98-db3 (MessageSwitch) id 1340384735407997_26373; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:05:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB3EHSMHS012.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.81.237]) by mail98-db3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F87F600A8; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:05:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0710HT002.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.133) by DB3EHSMHS012.bigfish.com (10.3.87.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:05:35 +0000
Received: from BL2PRD0710MB349.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.1.88]) by BL2PRD0710HT002.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.102.37]) with mapi id 14.16.0164.004; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:07:04 +0000
From: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Subject: Re: Proposed Update to Note Well
Thread-Topic: Proposed Update to Note Well
Thread-Index: AQHNUI4UF8urOkUi9ECLOMdvpukpJJcGfKEA//+OCQCAAH0uAP//lI+A
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:07:04 +0000
Message-ID: <CC09F337.8855E%stewe@stewe.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FE49DE2.1000207@stpeter.im>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.255.102.5]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <A509A18D276E43469F744F1E3B27C1C8@namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: stewe.org
Cc: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:07:17 -0000

Hi Peter,

On 6.22.2012 09:31 , "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:

>On 6/22/12 10:03 AM, Stephan Wenger wrote:
>>    
>>    "If you are aware of a patent controlled by your employer
>>    or sponsor that is related to your contribution, then you must
>>    disclose that patent."
>
>Why is it limited to employers and sponsors? I might control it myself
>directly, or just know that a patent covers it (BCP79, Section 6.1.1).

Section 6.1.1 requires the IPR being controlled by employer or sponsor.
The part you are referring to is gated by section 6.6, which is where
The employer or sponsor control is required.

That leaves us with

   If you are aware of a patent controlled by your employer
   or sponsor that is related to your contribution, then you must
   disclose that patent."


"Disclose that *patent*" instead of "disclose that *fact*", because we
Do not want to see disclosures suing "I'm aware of IPR covering my
Contribution".

My final word for today as well; see you all tomorrow on this fine list :-)

Stephan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email