Re: The Sheraton was a good choice for IETF 114 but....

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 04 August 2022 22:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48D4C14F742 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 15:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.705
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.705 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V79E_V1x69Vo for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 15:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCB82C14F73F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 15:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4CA38996; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 18:36:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id A67JDQKFzj2Y; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 18:36:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27728389A7; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 18:36:49 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1659652609; bh=JlrN5MpIfQQ/TsWyw+d5e9Q+gOE8flsRzOPAf4mrbN4=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=PUzYpB+SMdxVyC4AIFkYOBbBfr4FlaUi6bPMDsd7kAy0IqpmpqSrB55hEEw1z97zs SvbxjS144y4ZL8n/4tAvwWYJVQOM7AFIc2gqNgf1a79XO7zz8XD6/4GmvgKASo0rRX OAhY35e1R200IhcCGgvxZ/wfzx7X9jYXm+5270IilwkDrDIvWEO7BXRph17dYqBcbe QuUxoVeouYbD8D3ktTytmiAZieB64L2pJ06uazHauvS+myL1zjbsn8B8aNf42+Pw2D loJGpFdlxvATLb7mdUqQHjC2zN2o806JVeN2iYmZooIO8eVGoBxgBXZ3BoBKHhlv13 v7Ri3ePyQ6aDw==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047E51AB; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 18:17:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: The Sheraton was a good choice for IETF 114 but....
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwgjBZYufVWUO47jVZjJ2Ae=F7OCarraLhmCszpBfjtK3A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMm+LwgjBZYufVWUO47jVZjJ2Ae=F7OCarraLhmCszpBfjtK3A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 18:17:58 -0400
Message-ID: <8703.1659651478@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/p_zXfZT3rRyRkl2yyqFNX4JNZz0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 22:18:08 -0000

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> wrote:
    > If you used the in-room TV rather than ignoring it (as I usually do),
    > you will have noted that not only did it provide an easy means of
    > plugging in a HDMI cable (hooray!), it also provided an easy way to
    > connect to my NetFlix, Pandora etc. subscriptions. Another thing I very

Easy?  I thought I had to type in a password.  Maybe I missed something.

I think we have a new WG for this: tigress!


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide