Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard

Marc Manthey <marc@let.de> Fri, 26 August 2005 19:53 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8kGn-0000lO-3F; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:53:45 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8kGk-0000l2-Kz for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:53:42 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA11458 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:53:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from relay1.mail.vrmd.de ([81.28.232.18]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8kHL-0002Gl-55 for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:54:31 -0400
Received: from [195.14.200.119] (helo=[192.168.1.23]) by vm8.bln2.vrmd.de with asmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1E8kG5-0005FK-6W for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 21:53:01 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734)
In-Reply-To: <E4EEFE84-47AC-4C87-AD04-310217E33CDB@muada.com>
References: <200508251718.j7PHIEfU022394@relay1.apple.com> <C4C2FBBB1F98981B233FD87B@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <p0620072ebf33f205c054@[10.0.0.113]> <E4EEFE84-47AC-4C87-AD04-310217E33CDB@muada.com>
Message-Id: <BDBD9DBC-E96F-4C08-93FF-DA98E98B3073@let.de>
From: Marc Manthey <marc@let.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 21:52:53 +0200
To: IETF General Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734)
X-Relay-User: marc@let.de
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 093efd19b5f651b2707595638f6c4003
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1922161700=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

hopefully convalesce Marshall Eubanks wrote following  important lines

> why should a protocol that no-one will use be standards track ?
> This discussion is beginning to remind me of the scientific  
> standards processes involving the Soviet
> bloc that I was involved with during the Cold War. That is not a  
> good sign...

and a very disrespectful person named  Keith Moore wrote:

> Why should we accept a few (mostly axe-grinding) peoples'  
> assertions that no-one will use it?

  Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> I think the fact that mDNS has been successful in the market place  
> should be given a lot of consideration. At this point, something  
> new has to be a A LOT better to be worth the extra implementation  
> effort, and, more importantly: all the operational issues it will  
> cause (if there is any uptake) for years to come.
> I'm afraid we're looking at a new ip6.int / ip6.arpa debacle. This  
> stuff wastes SO MUCH time and effort that it's almost criminal to  
> make these changes if there is no clear technical advantage.

Russ Allbery wrote:
> Presumably the DNS working group has some incredibly strong  
> arguments that
> trump running code or they wouldn't have made the choices that they  
> have.
> Let's see them, and furthermore, let's see them *in the document*  
> or at
> least in a supporting informational document, since those of us on the
> IETF mailing list are certainly not the only people who are going  
> to have
> that question.

Rob Austein wrote a lot of importand stuff and ...

>  "How about tossing a coin?"

ladys and gentleman ,

i count over 170 application that are under deployment  or  allready  
successfully  implemented
why can t we have a constructional discussion how things could be  
progressed ?

<http://www.dns-sd.org/ServiceTypes.html>

pace Marc

--  
"Pulvis et umbra sumus" -  Staub und Schatten sind wir.

Les Enfants Terribles
www.let.de


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf