IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100

"Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net> Thu, 26 May 2016 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <zzhang@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0198712D79C; Thu, 26 May 2016 09:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DW-M7D2XdvPZ; Thu, 26 May 2016 09:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0107.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F3B212D7A2; Thu, 26 May 2016 09:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=Y4DzAbFo8Jjw7Cy82zSntg0+CgqvW0oC3g1T4lbxUnw=; b=OOhBEnYeHIq+B+doFR2F6x4PFUY0QEHMrVtV2Vo1NN0n5SK5tYJ8MZu5KZXt3rEX1E3kUqrbvr3wrLK3Co2/hDg26/UrSKQjpmmnH6ItWoIc4OrT4PKG/zl/Vu8iyYgmWlbcVLNb0BmRGwdUyDgCIQ3tr3jsz0iKmUQWIEiNmbc=
Received: from BLUPR0501MB1715.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.163.120.18) by BLUPR0501MB1716.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.163.120.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.506.9; Thu, 26 May 2016 16:56:59 +0000
Received: from BLUPR0501MB1715.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.120.18]) by BLUPR0501MB1715.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.120.18]) with mapi id 15.01.0501.013; Thu, 26 May 2016 16:56:59 +0000
From: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net>
To: Barry Raveendran Greene <bgreene@senki.org>, "Ietf@Ietf. Org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Thread-Topic: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Thread-Index: AQHRttIO9L+ZQjkLwEan4+d0pDYckJ/LZf4AgAAK6VA=
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 16:56:59 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR0501MB1715000F5A404F0E4DC1DAC4D4410@BLUPR0501MB1715.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20160525220818.18333.71186.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <700D9CB7-4EFD-459B-AA12-133A6BB04E90@senki.org>
In-Reply-To: <700D9CB7-4EFD-459B-AA12-133A6BB04E90@senki.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: senki.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;senki.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.10]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1f01080d-ff52-4b49-2d7c-08d38586c0ea
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR0501MB1716; 5:NSiyw41/n6iilA6Oe6PEvd1ovHvXLaUeJWAjjcSElDmf134jROYineIqoqEZoVc435anhK6TUKLcGiCRglUxFqgFIW43mcRvh2tc6h+ZPRwjSQpziSj3MpkbqWNFIod6uskDy5MxWBoFoL+uWgSqoQ==; 24:/o6GfiBdIs86LLPpN9TtVJ/aReUkT2tTxfjS7ImtaxTmny1WW22KBZRgnFVcV9p29EYczBct7UG5mGr43x8isihoH3JNpl0fXHvQAAlluSg=; 7:CQt92aRu+0NAdPiftaX1Pipy7Xgah2wu+ZMrYV8+p6zui9oCdX+reu4eADRrXJlHlAiT6GYdNPpcOWcdFj8VDLvGJPzgaEwLJct/83BAlExMJnQhkDPipDrNHyE+h2YsLZsiSFpihP8Hzg3gGLDEA7CL6RkAFGotPRObXb/tqkxCO8ngLygracC47W/ncQ7Y
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR0501MB1716;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR0501MB171654E9CDD625E289D0D6E1D4410@BLUPR0501MB1716.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026); SRVR:BLUPR0501MB1716; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB1716;
x-forefront-prvs: 0954EE4910
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(24454002)(377454003)(13464003)(106116001)(99286002)(3280700002)(3660700001)(50986999)(76176999)(92566002)(10400500002)(2906002)(122556002)(11100500001)(9686002)(33656002)(54356999)(87936001)(3846002)(4326007)(81166006)(102836003)(76576001)(8676002)(5001770100001)(5004730100002)(5002640100001)(74316001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(1220700001)(586003)(8936002)(66066001)(2950100001)(2900100001)(5003600100002)(77096005)(5008740100001)(86362001)(15975445007)(189998001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB1716; H:BLUPR0501MB1715.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 May 2016 16:56:59.6649 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR0501MB1716
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/plmOZMVjbr5eF_n_-T9SfL4fOZk>
Cc: "recentattendees@ietf.org" <recentattendees@ietf.org>, IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 16:57:03 -0000

No much difference in China either, and we had IETF in Beijing even though China has the famous Great Fire Wall of Internet.

Jeffrey

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Recentattendees [mailto:recentattendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Barry Raveendran Greene
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 12:15 PM
> To: Ietf@Ietf. Org <ietf@ietf.org>
> Cc: recentattendees@ietf.org; IETF Announcement List <ietf-
> announce@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF
> 100
> 
> 
> If this is being used as the justification, then South Korea must also be
> changed. Same problem.
> 
> > On May 25, 2016, at 3:08 PM, IAOC Chair <iaoc-chair@ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > Reasons for Cancellation of IETF 100 Meeting in Singapore, and the IAOC
> understands that to be:
> >
> > “    Singapore laws against same-sex relationships between men and
> >    preventing the recognition of same-sex marriages could create
> >    difficulties for same-sex partners and their children; these have
> >    discouraged affected members of our community from participating
> >    at the IETF meeting in November of 2017 and have also influenced
> >    others to decline to attend in principled solidarity with them.
> >
> >
> >    Accordingly, the IETF has decided to postpone indefinitely the
> meeting
> >    in Singapore and is pursuing alternative venues.”
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Recentattendees mailing list
> Recentattendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/recentattendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email