Re: IETF chair's blog

falsehood911@gmail.com Thu, 28 February 2013 06:54 UTC

Return-Path: <falsehood911@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC04821F8569 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:54:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x3Ra8A9UeUXB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:54:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ye0-f182.google.com (mail-ye0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0288F21F84D8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:54:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ye0-f182.google.com with SMTP id r9so216422yen.13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:54:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type :message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=5WsYzE2jbCkTX9M/rkNaXtxoFis5HFy8Q7VdS/rRbv8=; b=uCv08N3pX9foB6ZMZbyFzCvPoffoTAG8xM5jIzsdctCDIrRIUsaqJ25mZ/DlqcqaSB xzQmCw8DR4NWkYl+Y8nn1IzZ+N4Gq7eKT/ogyor0iUo0l8T6G4aM5GFa8CGQgaSqeTJ+ cOL+DDvSEfAQn7QxWMgliIPD2UMJWfH9mDmormmNG7hQanTb7L2XHc6NnfDi79eXPvTS V1HTEnjmyTPID5qycFnfgrcG7QBLYwKpzgqVEI7f8oBdq0j9pZMru/IJL7CFqvMv+HHL REuThZTN8K9mEawv9dswz7CcqSSywkfTizXARmqes9O3hj172YMzZeo7tbhWreKgS/eP PxAw==
X-Received: by 10.236.60.101 with SMTP id t65mr3900320yhc.190.1362034496570; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:54:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.6] (24-196-90-204.dhcp.mdsn.wi.charter.com. [24.196.90.204]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r43sm7845590yhl.19.2013.02.27.22.54.54 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:54:55 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
In-Reply-To: <512C3445.60709@lacnic.net>
References: <1BBAE003-DEA4-462A-998D-863F6FF90A69@ietf.org> <51298B1E.60007@lacnic.net> <512A5A10.4090406@acm.org> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B7A52DA@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <512B257A.3030902@lacnic.net> <CAOmxzdzxNejS_D3wHm_rPHBmAYZDXVK5odhP2ge057NQRu2mWw@mail.gmail.com> <512C3445.60709@lacnic.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <4E14AC56-45B1-4A5E-9501-2B6FB1E12159@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: falsehood911@gmail.com
Subject: Re: IETF chair's blog
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:54:52 -0600
To: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 06:55:00 -0000

Young people like myself may use other networks to communicate, but  
we also mistrust them. There is something virtuous about the IETF  
stance that is appealing and helpful to its brand (and made signing  
up for this listserve more attractive). I am wary of diluting that  
brand by putting the brand into walled gardens, especially any sort  
of Facebook page. Whatever use there is, it should be easy for people  
to find the open-source resources, keeping outside hosted content as  
a gateway into the ISTF.

-WLS

On Feb 25, 2013, at 10:04 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:

> t
> 	It appears that the path that this discussion has followed has proven
> your point.
>
> /as
>
> On 25/02/2013 23:31, Alejandro Acosta wrote:
>> On 2/25/13, Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> wrote:
>>> Fred,
>>>
>>> 	I am not convinced that social nets (proprietary or not) are yet  
>>> a good
>>> tool to do IETF work. They are good to communicate one-way and some
>>> informal two-ways, but that's all (at least for now)
>>>
>>> 	What I had in mind was something very simple such that the IETF  
>>> chair
>>> could do is to automatically post to twitter, facebook, etc whenever
>>> there is a new post from his blog and receive from communication  
>>> using
>>> those tools (besides the comments in the blog). But that is all.
>>
>> This scenario sounds good for me.  Of course this is not a
>> substitution of the mailing list, this is complementary. It's nice to
>> receive a tweet with the subject of the blog post and the URL to  
>> click
>> on it.
>>
>> Some time ago in this mailing list we were discussing that the  
>> average
>> age of IETF is getting old (of course, there are many exceptions).  
>> Did
>> you know that young people do not use email as much as us?. Saying
>> that, this can be a good way to bring young people to IETF.
>>
>> Alejandro Acosta,
>>
>>
>> {...}
>>