Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Sat, 15 February 2020 10:00 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B79120052 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 02:00:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ds-bTSh21asH for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 02:00:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6513120045 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 02:00:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 01FA0NTj031975 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 11:00:23 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 065F4200CC7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 11:00:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08F7200C56 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 11:00:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.11.240.2] ([10.11.240.2]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 01FA0KcN031922 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 11:00:22 +0100
Subject: Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus? - scaling infra
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <VE1PR03MB54220BB50CB38B6F4A72FC58EE1A0@VE1PR03MB5422.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <eb39f2cd-7a27-e0ff-3be4-6d03d13f31b8@gmail.com> <DACFBEF8-93A6-429C-AF16-19E01A0BEA50@consulintel.es> <PR1PR07MB500133F262F9883BE4F60DFD911A0@PR1PR07MB5001.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <D2E775EE-CEB8-414B-BDBD-666EE0E693EE@consulintel.es> <PR1PR07MB5001F523477A7074D8B2916F911A0@PR1PR07MB5001.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <1259484736.3639.1581678810470@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com> <935d1e4d-1e5a-2bdf-6b70-e018200c4900@gmail.com> <DM6PR05MB634841135740FEDBC44B2699AE150@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f840f90c-4891-ad93-dab7-1bf13b1b5338@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 11:00:19 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR05MB634841135740FEDBC44B2699AE150@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/pmm5CZXwv6VfJfoKwwZJS5ZNUIM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 10:00:27 -0000


Le 14/02/2020 à 16:50, Ron Bonica a écrit :
> Folks,
> 
> Given that the situation is still changing, many of the people who
> registered to attend IETF 107 in person may decide to attend remotely
> at the last minute.
> 
> Will our remote attendance infrastructure scale? Have we ever tested
> its scaling properties?

As far as I remember, there were about 10 people in the Meetecho in a 
room in the WG I attended on-site.

I suspect during the Plenary there were about 30 remote attendants 
remotely on meetcho.

It would need to scale from 30 to 2000, two orders of magnitude.

(evaluation might be biased)

Alex

> 
> Ron
> 
> 
> Juniper Business Use Only
>