Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring)

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 02 September 2004 16:37 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA16570; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 12:37:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2ucs-0002Fi-Cf; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 12:39:57 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2uNG-0006Ha-E0; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 12:23:46 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2uCz-0008BX-74 for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 12:13:09 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA15274 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 12:13:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2uFO-0000Li-Q6 for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 12:15:40 -0400
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Sep 2004 09:20:46 +0000
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
Received: from mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com [171.71.163.14]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i82GCRih011916; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 09:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CSCOAMERA19540.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-219.cisco.com [10.32.244.219]) by mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com (MOS 3.4.5-GR) with SMTP id AWT96584; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 09:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20040902091133.04c13ae0@mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com>
X-Sender: fred@mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 09:12:02 -0700
To: Carl Malamud <carl@media.org>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <200409021355.i82DtnrC029471@bulk.resource.org>
References: <20040902112648.834F836FB43@newdev.harvard.edu> <200409021355.i82DtnrC029471@bulk.resource.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aefe408d50e9c7c47615841cb314bed
Cc: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199

At 06:55 AM 09/02/04 -0700, Carl Malamud wrote:
>Perceptions are always important.  Under Scenario's A and B, likewise,
>the Internet Society probably gets to be a target.

The ISOC is a target anyway, as the RFCs have a copyright notice in them 
with ISOC's name in it. 


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf