Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 04 November 2019 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10EDB12007C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 13:12:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8VCy5U8VW9x2; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 13:12:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22c.google.com (mail-oi1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 321CC120052; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 13:12:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id n16so15511011oig.2; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 13:12:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5GPxn+0MWdR5M7/056w2kXRbcAaRkdB+/GJlnUspCnc=; b=Sf6p3z6dGa8NWKqjQalwUITZ4soLr07x6V27tnTnk9VqMBwswv6dEu4Z/g1i0skF/s P4p8LJKBJtTgX1X9Ev0zd+kuOjiG1ud9T3eqNwDAYmovlnXvu3T2jNjiUuPg9Ejd68Rf 6eZCrD/FqqJKuIza1Gv4IBtm4GeYLRkq6EiDT+RGWI0k1iO8X97bRZo6QBF0sYDT1uHj I7QS6yjpHxiZizPks8OFEOMEBKnEZmFQBvKOvY7wcL5S5T8ob8WLFTpW4Ra9j0EDI7go fS4jCeW6TFjO7rgPgWMPkEeAxDjxVNGrLdBzgM/EMnI9y0aD83cvvFp2GsIbtOGBPd+0 rR3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5GPxn+0MWdR5M7/056w2kXRbcAaRkdB+/GJlnUspCnc=; b=fhneFkkLlFBm05lQxN9c1ZDu7StuVSHuCNW6enMfk+qkRdImYTI3Q6VqRENPTf3Wf8 hyjf/FbnkhIOTd3Z6zMjoTNrsPPVJdJiCDcrVFbcVm6kBK72WTf54Ex7cxKtspeM6wWY Ms4qN73QEUgeJozukj4pEY5bpQogEWdYK1SRNNa88w7fl985Q6Dl2DirUN/kqdmlzFl/ HvVvozC7xzW6+5wxF/QWJ9l5Ljauh73UjOa6irmA/JfkFDzbhSdbIfpTNcCMqsCpIuok HMaZgd6zCC2E7QlZ8C8a79TQN81TBPJbDaRxK/mrRdH6sehbZOPTJRAjF1MRDcerEecc 009w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXvMsDHpdYXGz+1aNKh8ITwjstTYJJIKdnxOIxBxUEPgcI+K0+5 W70/kuvxmPZopHLx+bP+HcV5t05nYvRug4yXukc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxARPxg8Xlh6wNxeqU2ToAvSISAmRAZB7TRkmbUwpoKlL3FSjLc69JxIWEZQAEhNqwlaqfpj2XUGArlNVvPV1M=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:498:: with SMTP id z24mr921138oid.114.1572901958438; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 13:12:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <157279399807.13506.13363770981495597049.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0EF64763-BA25-468A-B387-91445A61D318@gmail.com> <CAJU8_nUovmFmgNiYx0ez_1f+GPdU9xGViDYWfowEEomrn0pyDw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911040841160.27600@bofh.nohats.ca> <CE06CC6D-E37F-4C90-B782-D14B1D715D4B@cable.comcast.com> <38E47448-63B4-4A5D-8A9D-3AB890EBDDDD@akamai.com> <9D0E5D44-552D-4F07-A53E-AFC4B9B733E2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9D0E5D44-552D-4F07-A53E-AFC4B9B733E2@gmail.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 16:12:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH6y9ZF9AzR9O4Q_=Kzn4VO0ixnCSF0vS2qwZM5xgHu2dA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>, "nomcom-chair-2019@ietf.org" <nomcom-chair-2019@ietf.org>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007fd48205968bc6d9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/pqX-PAV52ZF0I6d_0vKBFCQYtn4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 21:12:41 -0000

On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:09 PM Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> > On 4 Nov 2019, at 21:54, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> >
> > I wonder what people think would break if we moved to 5 AD's per area,
> and they could divide the WG's and IESG concalls amongst themselves?
> >
>
> Five?  We barely manage to get two.  Where will we find five?
>
> This WG chair gig that you and I do?  We can sell it to our respective
> employers as something we do in our spare time.  An AD’s job?  Not so much.
>
> Yes, having five of them would mean that each supervises 1-2 working
> groups. It might make scheduling sessions in a meeting a bit easier. But
> the ADs will still have to attend all three meetings plus the retrieat, and
> most of them are still going to be reading every draft.  I can see this
> cutting the AD job down to 25 hours a week, maybe even 20. But that’s still
> a sizeable chunk of time, and it makes you not available for crunch time
> for your employer.
>
> It might get Kyle’s $600,000 down to $400,000.  A decent chunk of change,
> and now you want 30 such chunks rather than 14.
>
> I don’t think adding more management is the solution.
>

Right and then you have to coordinate among them all, which is time
consuming.

I, and others are willing to help talk to management to justify the role
and time spent.  I think there's a pretty compelling argument.

Best regards,
Kathleen

-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen