IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: BCP97bis

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sat, 16 October 2021 04:47 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD423A0913 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 21:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RQe4RQKGWoaR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 21:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92e.google.com (mail-ua1-x92e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C28623A090F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 21:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92e.google.com with SMTP id i22so361280ual.10 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 21:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nQlXJ8fWq5hd82TmV7teJXG5XUrp24LX72OkGpOV7w0=; b=HxIYI7E1AcPcYwOmsSvAfK16qW94d8b6PUYCZBB9f4mnzuQEXoed1daocO4eTCTEk2 8aItSJcqDpRHjoFwxgH9IPU2AaIC55E/dmqN29AWilHFLd3uPhZ2t9SNl75FoPeSUBfZ xsufkA56M5F2FQwPRdli7KeVEiWVfZkgsOoHGdAl2iBHUxVN9A5FTGb1whr+vc+QfIuy gxacXDQbh9JRsc3d8GI02MENfmyLMYjB4q8XysAYa/wLsb+2OaDktGSQv7EXt6G/9wgI GLeaaCKxdCor9xYyr1DtT0OyPbK1fSC1q106TBSwssjp9r4px0cLWvusgPukol4cGu7K M3AQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nQlXJ8fWq5hd82TmV7teJXG5XUrp24LX72OkGpOV7w0=; b=L55cJaTgi2zqVb4rXSLzwCPraqmR3lfrIcFc8PDZw8xKtYdie6T20ULcqc2H7GjeSO 3xZSoouwQo6pzIgFrm1I+60COQJ1aqwma7r7XHU/m6lFevIETUIWf3vpbGZ3fbBXtc/X zMDPsx/mabdqMwyIGWCXa27fv2XBKzOfE+0W+R7cOkPULAGChR1QmaFpxZYfsMaSQRXF Xkc9RKZPeirNBhC/xeIMVft5Z8mRo/pzeAGQM6mK2bE0HIHYGOxX+UCDRRrDBRQPvZnz Eov/pMUBq4mlVQYAPb4tUWX3BRNU+gnLY+VJ4bxllS8nUO1hykHclltzItPw5unox7sF F4rQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5334yEpgsniGxQMmmBaMWjkrtSnkHnuiiRfzdWQ0NZeWBJXiISqm 6cu0xz1Boav4APsTLzC8cgjFHFTclvQvYdoof5xPyP2G
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxI1tYflVnhgcm9+SWKlhWlHp+tPsoBIc0FB16u+cHCqybC1OGAclaSTd2Aw7oDCXmb66ksWFUNUtpIwfeqOU=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:ab04:: with SMTP id u4mr18188829vse.12.1634359652566; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 21:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwbwvs2Cp_urgJ=hzc6yEMGDaz3C0xf6RQXRrB89wAx=Rw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwavK5dYdmYPVxdMT5rA=jBZv1cEyAsVBEWOD7p9MoZR1g@mail.gmail.com> <A0343309-3371-405C-A039-161D8787966B@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <A0343309-3371-405C-A039-161D8787966B@sobco.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 21:47:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwY69dHZZwkWHXDuHMQtiYe8QCqQNnP2a9CFsDNfp-CWSA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: BCP97bis
To: Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000086c81b05ce7102ef"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/prUkVOJFWSjdwkcaVXGB8Q6GF0o>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 04:47:39 -0000

Hi Scott,

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 12:38 PM Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com> wrote:

> RFC 1818 is not a good reference for BCPs - RFC 2026 is the better one
>

That reference is preserved from RFC 3967.  Also, RFC 1818 is not obsolete,
so presumably what it says is still valid.

Should that spot refer to both 2026 and 1818, perhaps?

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email