Re: [6lo] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-06.txt> (6lowpan ESC Dispatch Code Points and Guidelines) to Proposed Standard

sajjad akbar <sajjad.akr1@gmail.com> Sat, 26 November 2016 12:32 UTC

Return-Path: <sajjad.akr1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C293129401 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 04:32:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2xLVmHI7rz6u for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 04:32:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22a.google.com (mail-lf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C6E612943A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 04:32:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id b14so66377050lfg.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 04:32:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=lBh43u71YD2/z7m8nSFOLgf/unIk/ifCgt9BPRGy/Sg=; b=wb4Lww2/Mn89GCgOQh5DvOW1c2H9tsxxJCI9Mqda2f7PbJDsWvdaZ/U2Kl4Mezp/Gw cJ+pSkOz7J3Iv5Ai6bydP4AM4fc/7CRlf968REHMAUU+gAmovN9je6fp5Fa/ZL4wmoLh F3GMTcxMHH6t9PxGIwCT2LM6Jscz+24uEO6A9HOk7NjhEPDmawvM8eXaQsE4pfyUcI30 FjPGJWOpkFtbbT8ZWQV2erGRoxn5pE6hDzvLKDxclxAdbQZkBiKaCW47VE0J9M+a4ftM k6TugeYQ2AJ1BcNf/zhsfvHhfCzIIpBuIV84EVMfIMYRAdHiBGudX7uM6wx/E8Xfc2bj zeeQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=lBh43u71YD2/z7m8nSFOLgf/unIk/ifCgt9BPRGy/Sg=; b=EUVTxy8S3kPgzkXcYDQfexx61iwlFyyJ0l1NmP8RFPZLQmFMc72D8dBo5UwdmUBBW6 m4Em4Ruum/SRwlpn2MJIMnJQJcJLCWn1NzryMtWv2bJ/4ZIQ3wAg3mo++/O3Ejk+/gBv PfVefi6Hq3TV4pRILQZbetJLQ0w7REXp/wbmTn9IR4OHdbuCzLlptks9zvDTq3RSy5ZW mI5uJ3ICdprHZ4a5ve4zkz0vV0FmkrZv/VL8d0DiNedGTmM1NKxVOsW1LABEAzv9G6Gy 4HyFki0+SnqWuYUaodUdSSnfRpkdRKSN3f0ZpypcCR0472bOj00Wv1mjEZ46rbGH3BdP phTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00Xm3OH5U4z7wfY8EvyfRJY9oKN/xYOohaGB1Hk5YF7dt8arlnzT2HgxN++EeHZSsHDnl1cIWDe1j5OhA==
X-Received: by 10.25.150.210 with SMTP id y201mr5336214lfd.58.1480163575155; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 04:32:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.196.210 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 04:32:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <147935783336.23923.6753600465148661016.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <147935783336.23923.6753600465148661016.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: sajjad akbar <sajjad.akr1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 12:32:54 +0000
Message-ID: <CAByBar8b1CiC4Rgg48B6Vt+3Rxe_No2C-o4YP73EUMQQiLyz3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-06.txt> (6lowpan ESC Dispatch Code Points and Guidelines) to Proposed Standard
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114017ce1b502c054233709a
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/px0-CKZbXbXnW9rm4smkgPY1nBo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 12:32:59 -0000

Hi

Can anyone recommend me a draft where routing issues are discussed in 6lo?
I am working on link metrics for routing in low-power networks and it will
help me to align my research according to some standard.

Looking forward for the reply

Regards
Sajjad

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:43 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> The IESG has received a request from the IPv6 over Networks of
> Resource-constrained Nodes WG (6lo) to consider the following document:
> - '6lowpan ESC Dispatch Code Points and Guidelines'
>   <draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-06.txt> as Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-12-08. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
>    RFC4944 defines the ESC dispatch type to allow for additional
>    dispatch bytes in the 6lowpan header.  The value of the ESC byte was
>    updated by RFC6282, however, its usage was not defined either in
>    RFC6282 or in RFC4944.  This document updates RFC4944 and RFC6282 by
>    defining the ESC extension byte code points including registration of
>    entries for known use cases at the time of writing of this document.
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-
> iana-registry/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
>