Re: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb

[Dave Crocker <[e-mail]>]

On 11/28/2013 3:18 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> I think that two consensus calls should be taken at this stage:

I concur with the precedence concerns that have already been raised, and 
also wonder about trying to orchestrate a sequence of consensus calls 
designed to move the group through a process that will get some folk to 
change their positions, in order to get the matter resolved.

The simplest form of such a sequence that I've heard about is to note 
the impasse, then ask whether the group does want to get the matter 
resolve.  That's likely to get a strong rough consensus yes.  Then note 
it's not going to resolve until folk change their current positions. 
The example I heard about did then produce a preferred choice.

No doubt, the current situation has folk who are more tenacious, so 
perhaps the sequence of calls needs to be a bit more elaborate.

BTW, as distasteful as it might be, is there a reason that making /both/ 
MTI would not work?

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net