Re: How to pay $47 for a copy of RFC 793

Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> Wed, 11 May 2011 19:09 UTC

Return-Path: <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603B2E0886 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 12:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K0grUj6f4cpi for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 12:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ka.mail.enyo.de (ka.mail.enyo.de [87.106.162.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92312E07C2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 12:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.17.135.4] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by ka.mail.enyo.de with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1QKEmk-0002cg-0u; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:09:26 +0200
Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <fw@deneb.enyo.de>) id 1QKEmj-0003v8-Nz; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:09:25 +0200
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: Bob Braden <braden@isi.edu>
Subject: Re: How to pay $47 for a copy of RFC 793
References: <4DC71403.9010505@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:09:25 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4DC71403.9010505@isi.edu> (Bob Braden's message of "Sun, 08 May 2011 15:06:59 -0700")
Message-ID: <8739klcavu.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 19:09:31 -0000

* Bob Braden:

> Now, it has always been IETF's (and even before there was an IETF,
> Jon Postel's) policy to allow people to sell RFCs. What astonishes
> me is that clever people in the IEEE don't know RFCs are available
> free online. I guess RFCs remain so counter-cultural that industrial
> types don't get it. I wonder how many other IEEE standards contain
> similar RFC-for-pay references..

A lot of the stuff IEEE publishes for a fee is freely and legally
available from other sources (without the official IEEE imprint, of
course).  IEEE performs extensive search engine optimization (aka
Google spamming) to get their for-pay content rated over the free
content.  I suppose this is required because otherwise, library access
statistics would plummet and libraries would cancel their
subscriptions. *sigh*

(Same for ACM, Springer, and so one, of course.)