Re: Registration details for IETF 108

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Mon, 01 June 2020 03:00 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E543D3A0B25 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2020 20:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=sjt+e/ms; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=sHhLfxds
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qibk7x73Y1oy for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2020 20:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C7003A0906 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 May 2020 20:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99695C00DC; Sun, 31 May 2020 23:00:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 31 May 2020 23:00:12 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm3; bh=0 cB+LInMrz0W7agjBI9oZV9rgaNVqOktkqmsyU+vdaw=; b=sjt+e/msiZo9lWlfW MojbaCOyHPYK0IzuigJArQ3dT7/wLJ1nrZmU5EyfRlcppalOFc/TJTJYBICfZcVf eBLVLboKQqXzPsd/AyP7CkzFjHAYxetWQ79fr5e/YfC9rgVrd43jDi4AXQ02EVEQ sr77QQPEn6IgBlZTIef8/L9LB92J/TEiBkFJVnLnxaH11eaPdNPzGOqZYodUte9I kJgfncWrxA+8JchpvW/DEkUAeC9oxViZygSeKBE+6y3JsP7oK41MmleImiZjPkLH qnn0bCNjzovf+1UZf25cmtSymdlOgrJjqhbF43jEDr+3qmbCyP7jnIjUAK4aCXwy /mDjA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=0cB+LInMrz0W7agjBI9oZV9rgaNVqOktkqmsyU+vd aw=; b=sHhLfxdsha/VDWnoIydM4FUpWhSO2UR06xf1+biaIjXAcMVIeaG5IA3Ec vpDV4+oCq/CtHX7/Z3vNLz9X9rQS7ZxqLthuug5+BcCgCaxWuR2+2WbRpWl5PtWa s6CbFZ46BhcPhkQc8FnBmTFY6NMhAFz/QQrYgwvSi8RW8SSOa3ErPXjGOqlKGMdZ QNuAAg50qxUBOUlhepSaZrqrCZeCy5n66/tDysOSRGuPVJDfikfUM6beq4aXihkb aNq4UEWC/DEai4q8e8o1j7ehmBXYSi+HYpiV5ItEJbMoXfA++EAQSTgmOUqsHQd9 TAgDbZuWJKqNg0/2/IvKsdyX/pEnA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:PG_UXmRVGgm17hncz0SLVjciBiUgmrrqDtpUqX5MjJmfvjFtL5eTLg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudefgedgiedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtjeenucfhrhhomheptehlihhs shgrucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpefguedtkeethfekleehheethedvkeektedtvddvjefghfeikeffgeegveef ueegtdenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppedujeefrdefkedrudduje drledtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep rghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:PG_UXrxPFEFzo2xkFLVN-hccxMWeZoa_Nt8fRUISTW2p_f3StCDP1Q> <xmx:PG_UXj0z-XWOtqgLtCuOM3sv-Q9EqS7huIC5byIDG3eNfE7GCuAeAQ> <xmx:PG_UXiALQ4YuhPixdz0g1cOTZC_5Cp0y9IXd0818-EH8IfLnK3OA_g> <xmx:PG_UXhc-FLsk1k2n40gQYWeShe2u94Lp8g0E6EKomJjMX3NHelEZTg>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.90]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 443943061856; Sun, 31 May 2020 23:00:12 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.5\))
Subject: Re: Registration details for IETF 108
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <8f464404-5278-8178-66e5-44eaed748141@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 23:00:11 -0400
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, ietf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5B1FD06B-BC4F-49E0-97A2-DF8A48CC24FB@cooperw.in>
References: <159062833754.6110.5826748635235943562@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200531121457.0b249858@elandnews.com> <CABcZeBOzVHaSZa0A3eDz12RwNuCiHtiJL8wqvAhhLPN6YEQOkQ@mail.gmail.com> <afa11959-3348-4054-409c-803824a2f332@gmail.com> <b31bc70b-cc73-45e4-9449-d85313a88037@gmail.com> <f1d15bec-080a-7726-1921-8a06949b231f@cs.tcd.ie> <8f464404-5278-8178-66e5-44eaed748141@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/q4BbSeJ_bYwBMyq3F-ENmX1OPAI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 03:00:15 -0000

Hi,

> On May 31, 2020, at 10:50 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 01-Jun-20 11:57, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 31/05/2020 23:33, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>> What troubles me is the lack of a debate in the community before this
>>> was announced with about a week's notice.
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> The lack of any community debate is very disappointing.
>> It doesn't matter if this is not intended as a precedent,
>> it will set a precedent.
> 
> I wanted to add two things.
> 
> 1. There's no complaint about the IETF LLC as far as I'm concerned.
> They're doing their job.
> 
> 2. The announcement message about IETF 108 being on-line:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/kzC7M48oKrAwdh9uyOvseeKFW3A
> IMO really should have pre-announced and justified the intention
> to apply a fee, and that the decision is for one meeting only, so
> that we can have a community debate about long-term policy on this.

We didn’t know on May 14 whether there would be a registration fee or what it would be, and we felt it was important to stick to the timeline that we had shared with the community as far as announcing the decision about conversion to an online meeting.

Alissa

> 
>    Brian
>