Re: Internet 2020 Goals

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Wed, 28 May 2014 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616EF1A024B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 13:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H0oc5SoMUYaE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 13:44:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E5DF1A0675 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2014 13:44:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.160.166] (abc.isi.edu [128.9.160.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s4SKhDHJ008282 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 28 May 2014 13:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53864A61.302@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 13:43:13 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: carlos@lacnic.net, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Internet 2020 Goals
References: <CAMm+LwiNxZYcT5QEseyUfQAXuZ28ufvr5V4c=chuT5d9gJSgeA@mail.gmail.com> <5383933A.8050804@gmail.com> <5383F53B.7050308@meetinghouse.net> <5384D2DA.7030900@isi.edu> <538598E0.4040003@tana.it> <538614C2.8080909@isi.edu> <538647EE.8050902@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <538647EE.8050902@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/qAIoeGFTfdFbn40RB20rV0888IU
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 20:45:01 -0000


On 5/28/2014 1:32 PM, Carlos M. Martinez wrote:
> Interesting reading, but it doesn't really address the original post's
> idea.
>
> Setting some goals and a general vision is not prognostication. It's
> thinking about how you want things to be, rather than trying to guess
> what they'll be like.
>
> You might never get there, and  that's ok. But it helps upholding values
> and principles, and guides new work.
>
> It's a bit like writing science fiction.
>
> I, for one, would propose leaving past grievances in the past and to
> look towards the future.

My point still remains; the future lies with those who invent it, not 
with those who want merely to talk about it.

Absent research funds to make things happen, having the IETF - or ISOC - 
host such an exercise serves no useful purpose other than to occupy the 
time of the participants.

That being said, it's a perfect honeypot for those so inclined.

Joe

>
> Cheers!
>
> ~Carlos
>
> On 5/28/14, 1:54 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/28/2014 1:05 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>>> On Tue 27/May/2014 20:00:58 +0200 Joe Touch wrote:
>>>> On 5/26/2014 7:15 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>>>>> At one time, NSF and the National Academy of Sciences used to publish
>>>>> "research agendas" for networking - when did this stop?
>>>>
>>>> It didn't, and all such reports (including 2020 visions) have had the
>>>> same amount of impact (lots of heat, but no light IMO).
>>>>
>>>> Unless the IETF is prepared to put up research money to back it up*,
>>>> making statements about the future of the Internet is unproductive
>>>> prognostication.
>>>
>>> Yet they spend some bucks on it:
>>
>> The *IETF* has not.
>>
>>> Moving towards a more robust, secure and agile Internet
>>> NSF announces $15 million in awards to develop, deploy and test future
>>> Internet architectures
>>> http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=131248&org=CISE&from=news
>>
>> The NSF and DARPA absolutely have.
>>
>> DARPA has been two-faced about it, though - on the one hand, repeatedly
>> celebrating the Internet as it's "poster" success story, on the other
>> hand undermining the entire concept of shepherding nascent ideas for the
>> 20+ years it took for the Internet to gain traction. Shame on anyone
>> from our community who attended one of these celebrations since Tether's
>> tenure there, IMO.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>