Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")

Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com> Wed, 30 March 2016 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BC212D54C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vBToef-hocCG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3BC312D5D2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D175B1A4563D; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:28:22 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com
Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0iKIRRh8laoc; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:28:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from newdev.cadm.harvard.edu (newdev.cadm.harvard.edu [128.103.229.199]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC8361A4562F; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:28:21 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: Last Call on draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt ("Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology")
From: Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <56FBF599.9080605@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:28:21 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ACC702C9-C33F-4D38-B47A-8BC293D24621@sobco.com>
References: <0000431F-F977-4A24-BA4D-064F740977A0@piuha.net> <56FBF599.9080605@ericsson.com>
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/qELSx0v94Slg-dP5qwifZs9onZ4>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:28:29 -0000

this was the (strong?) consensus of the IPR BOF

Scott

> On Mar 30, 2016, at 11:49 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Section 1 (Definitions), subsection k says the following:
> 
>>      Without limiting the generality of the
>>      foregoing, acting as a working group chair or Area Director
>>      constitutes "Participating" in all activities of the relevant
>>      working group or area.
> 
> The AD of a large area may not get to read all individual I-Ds or all
> email messages sent in all the WGs of the area. We may want to define
> this a bit more explicitly.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> On 22/03/2016 2:17 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
>> 
>> All,
>> 
>> RFC 3979 was published in 2005. Since then we’ve gathered a lot of experience, and we’d like to update the RFC with that experience. This isn’t a revolution of the IETF IPR approach, it is mostly about clarification, better documentation, and recognising some other new RFCs and changes. But the document itself has changed quite a lot and structured differently than RFC 3979 was.
>> 
>> Some of the main issues (such as how to define participation) were discussed in the IETF-87 meeting, but there are also a number of other changes in this document. Please give this document a careful read, and let us know your feedback.
>> 
>> I am starting a last call on this document today, but gave a longer last call period to make sure everyone has enough time to comment after IETF-95 as well. And thanks for the comments that some of you have already sent after the document was published; we’ve observed them and will make them part of the feedback from the Last Call.
>> 
>> The document is available here:
>> 
>>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bradner-rfc3979bis/
>>   https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08
>> 
>> Jari Arkko (as the responsible AD for this document)
>> 
>