Re: [79all] IETF Badge

Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Mon, 15 November 2010 22:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ole@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EA83A6D5D for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:48:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.732
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.732 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.799, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SARE_FWDLOOK=1.666, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bd9q13grAhhK for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:48:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262983A6D61 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:48:45 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAG9H4UyrR7H+/2dsb2JhbACiW3GlfII+DQGYVYMLgj8EhFqBKoQISw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,202,1288569600"; d="scan'208";a="286964391"
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Nov 2010 22:48:09 +0000
Received: from pita.cisco.com (pita.cisco.com [171.71.177.199]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oAFMm9VM004077; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:48:09 GMT
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:47:34 -0800 (PST)
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Subject: Re: [79all] IETF Badge
In-Reply-To: <4CE1B13E.4040106@labn.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011151441040.22013@pita.cisco.com>
References: <1106719229.799545.1289526328086.JavaMail.root@sz0152a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011112007060.12026@pita.cisco.com> <201011122308.oACN89K1013100@sj-core-1.cisco.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011121616000.12606@pita.cisco.com> <fdd5875b1cd04.1cd04fdd5875b@huawei.com> <4CE06071.8000805@labn.net> <082301cb846d$107e1070$317a3150$%cui@huawei.com> <4CE133DC.30209@labn.net> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011151142270.8067@pita.cisco.com> <4CE1B13E.4040106@labn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:48:59 -0000

Lou,

I see. So you had to take off your shoes, leave water behind and be 
frisked and/or scanned at this meeting? I can't say I went to every
meeting room, but I did not notice any of that going on.

Also, when I say "suggesting" it's sort of meant to be a forward 
looking statement not some idea that what we had will be the new
norm. I'd love to not have to write this down, but if I did it
would be something along the lines of "Entrance to IETF meetings
is for registered attendeed, wear you badge at all times, you may
be challenged if you don't do so." And maybe add specifics as
was done in this case.

I agree that this was a great meeting, thanks to the host and everyone 
else involved including the hotel staff!

Ole

Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole@cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj



On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Lou Berger wrote:

> Humm, seeing that's what we just had, I'm not sure where you're coming from.
> 
> BTW I don't think there was any real surprise in this, and it doesn't diminish
> from our local hosts' fabulous job.  I thank them for their efforts and
> hospitality.
> 
> Lou
> 
> On 11/15/2010 2:44 PM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Lou Berger wrote:
> >
> > > Xiangsong,
> > > 	I suspect you may have misunderstood me.  I'm endorsing the old
> > > practice of letting in (to meetings) any who wish *without* payment or
> > > badge.
> > > Sure they won't be able to go into the terminal room, but that isn't a
> > > significant issue.  Them eating the snacks could possibly turn into an
> > > issue,
> > > but it hasn't to date.
> > >
> > > Lou
> >
> > I am sure this happens already to some extent and I don't think it's
> > an issue (having a guest speaker, someone who wants to find out about
> > a specific working group, whatever...). So long as this does not turn
> > into a way to abuse the system, I don't think anyone is suggesting TSA
> > style security at our meetings.
> >
> > Ole
> >
> >
> > Ole J. Jacobsen
> > Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
> > Cisco Systems
> > Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
> > E-mail: ole@cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
>