Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework-08

"Peter Yee" <peter@akayla.com> Sun, 15 July 2012 01:01 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@akayla.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A388521F85EF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 18:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zAJW4yK4P7de for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 18:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa08-01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa08-01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.193.102]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CBA8721F85DD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 18:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 23737 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2012 01:01:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (173.8.184.78) by p3plsmtpa08-01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (173.201.193.102) with ESMTP; 15 Jul 2012 01:01:38 -0000
From: Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>
To: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework-08
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 18:01:57 -0700
Message-ID: <003c01cd6225$6f4cab60$4de60220$@akayla.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac1iHPxAQ3X+yUjHRlS1K0UX/TXCcw==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 07:25:43 -0700
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 01:01:09 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.

Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework-08
Reviewer: Peter Yee
Review Date: 14-July-2012
IETF LC End Date: 17-July-2012
IESG Telechat date: Pending

Summary: This draft provides a framework for the creation of DNSSEC Policies
and Practice Statements. 

Major Issues: None

Minor Issues: 

Section 4.4.5 discusses how to handle key compromise.  It might be useful to
discuss here or somewhere else in the document how the compromise is
prevented from recurring if there were no attenuating measures in place
beforehand.  That might well lead to a revision of the DP or DPS.  The draft
doesn't really discuss under what circumstances a document should be
iterated or amended.  Of course, that might be considered a meta issue
and outside of the scope of the DP or DPS proper.

Nits/editorial comments: 

In Section 4.6, "behaviour" is spelt in the British manner.  While
most assuredly not incorrect, you may wish to spell it in the
American manner.

Serial commas are used inconsistently.  Nothing as egregious as the
following
example, however. ;-)
http://grammarnowtips.wordpress.com/2011/01/08/a-case-for-the-serial-comma/