Re: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)]
Marc Manthey <marc@let.de> Fri, 16 September 2005 15:13 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EGHuK-0008IO-0T; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:13:44 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EGHuG-0008H9-Ge for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:13:40 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA22650 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:13:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from relay1.mail.vrmd.de ([81.28.232.18]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGHzB-0000PH-74 for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:18:52 -0400
Received: from [213.196.205.36] (helo=[192.168.1.23]) by vm8.bln2.vrmd.de with asmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1EGHth-000250-PU for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:13:06 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734)
In-Reply-To: <20050916132930.136EF3BFEDB@berkshire.machshav.com>
References: <20050916132930.136EF3BFEDB@berkshire.machshav.com>
Message-Id: <83ED2F85-B07B-41A3-AF93-F7A132B50A1F@let.de>
From: Marc Manthey <marc@let.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:12:59 +0200
To: IETF General Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734)
X-Relay-User: marc@let.de
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d2b46e3b2dfbff2088e0b72a54104985
Subject: Re: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)]
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1387736693=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
On Sep 16, 2005, at 3:29 PM, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: > In message <432A92C1.5040003@zurich.ibm.com>, Brian E Carpenter > writes: > >> Michael Thomas wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Perfect. And then someone with less clue decided to >>> plant Kudzu. We have nothing to say about that? >>> >> >> I just read today that kudzu extract may reduce the desire >> for alcohol (Scientific American, 8/2005, p 17). What seems >> evil may not always be evil. >> > > Have you ever lived in the southern U.S.? It's amazing driving > through > some areas, where you see kudzu covering trees, barns, telephone > polls, > and some slow-moving cows... wow, i never heard of it but it looks very nice http://www.jjanthony.com/kudzu/ greetings > > >>> >>> I know that we aren't the net.cops, but are we not >>> net.stewards either? >>> >> >> Up to a point, but there are limits to what we can do. >> >> We can request that the RFC Editor not publish things we think >> are damaging. The IESG does this a few times a year. Similarly, >> we can request that IANA not register things we think are >> damaging, or at least to label them as potentially dangerous. >> >> We can publish screeds about damaging practices. The IAB does this >> a few times a year. >> >> We can try to develop non-damaging solutions for requirements where >> the easy solutions are damaging, and we can try to repair our own >> damage (as HTTP 1.1 repairs HTTP 1.0). >> >> We can try to ensure that the Internet can 'route around damage' - >> that's one of the main reasons for defending the e2e principle, >> for example. >> >> But we can't prevent people from deploying solutions that we >> didn't develop, and we shouldn't even try to IMHO. >> >> > > Agreed. Sometimes the IETF does the initial engineering, sometimes it > has to do garbage collection and repair, and hope that the operators > can cope in the meantime. > > --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > -- " Sic transit gloria mundi" Les Enfants Terribles www.let.de
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms]… Marc Manthey
- RE: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on… Nelson, David
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on… Sam Hartman
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on… Sam Hartman
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on… Ned Freed
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on… Michael Thomas
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on… Ned Freed
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on… Michael Thomas
- BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- … Paul Hoffman
- CH and p2p [Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter brok… Michael Thomas
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter brok… Paul Hoffman
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter brok… Scott W Brim
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter brok… Michael Thomas
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter brok… Michael Thomas
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter brok… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISM… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms]… Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms]… Michael Thomas
- RE: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms]… Nicholas Staff