Re: [saag] i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))

Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Mon, 12 January 2015 23:36 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9541ACE07; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:36:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HrlKJaXvvspz; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:36:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com (sabertooth01.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EA3B1ACE04; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:36:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1421105785; x=1452641785; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z2n3yF0OIDnW6t3oXpr8J5JH/uZlcH+qu55m6zD5jG8=; b=xWXIDLYcWXFeYpXoCUJaZ3Pr8A1mh/LCTxwHS92KWjfGo0dixxUOqI92 NGDCsi6v4tksI5sdF6jmIZ1v6KjCJ2jvDPvIlE0YfDChIoi0tJfUKcJe6 DtGANGvo/I/twZq3JQ2A6NtkmFF57VyE27TsqPuc23317y6t4TeQzjYba g=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5600,1067,7679"; a="81409320"
Received: from ironmsg04-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.18]) by sabertooth01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 12 Jan 2015 15:36:24 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,745,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="882646541"
Received: from nasanexm01f.na.qualcomm.com ([10.85.0.32]) by Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 12 Jan 2015 15:36:24 -0800
Received: from resnick2.qualcomm.com (10.80.80.8) by NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.995.29; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:36:22 -0800
Message-ID: <54B45A75.1050503@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:36:21 -0600
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Subject: Re: [saag] i18n requirements (was: Re: NF* (Re: PKCS#11 URI slot attributes & last call))
References: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73AAF5744C@uxcn10-tdc05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C71D55675E67@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <20150112045411.GD16323@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20150112045411.GD16323@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8]
X-ClientProxiedBy: NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.32) To NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.32)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/qRGsGdCsgZJawzYHZRYielXbHUk>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>, Jan Pechanec <jan.pechanec@oracle.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 23:36:27 -0000

On 1/11/15 10:54 PM, Nico Williams wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 05:28:30PM -0500, Salz, Rich wrote:
>
>    
>>> I'd go even further than that and just mandate MUST ASCII.
>>>        
>>   
>> I don't know if the IETF is "allowed" to do that any more, but +1 for
>> the reasons you list.
>>      
> I'm not sure if the IESG will agree to that...

Given that this particular member of the IESG has (successfully) argued 
vehemently for ASCII-only on multiple occasions in the recent past, I 
would say that your worries on that score are overdone. :-)

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478