Re: [IAOC] question to the IAOC: new committee members

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Thu, 17 November 2016 01:24 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=112957b6f1=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C031295F3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:24:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=jordi.palet@consulintel.es header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y3_1Ka3HD8NZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:24:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [217.126.185.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A57A91295DE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:24:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1479345855; x=1479950655; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic: References:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=PpNxUG99vKUyjwEk642UwErtu BooYyaB8uraMfrGbvo=; b=MfoaMbDPrwnwzAJNaVMWaRNkH75U6VHo+W8pu/bjw SZmHuO+MacH2pX5yNNCTMIitgVYzbv+xoK1p0o2hOrFFLsYx80PmYAn27QH2hf/9 FDmEl/q+rKXBo6Ybu7pyhFG2YLCxiYW3xLGBMP/Tt53QPfB6LmwVH3jSiWSOK9wD xY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=lmBWSNCLM3jpy/WnIDK8p/lbYknqnxlDp/jVkM/uuzElb8ehzmXZgBC2UzMg atPV+N2HeDJi25blqjS7plU7uSDxXQz6gXLe3DRFaEeRUAArLwjlbKlEt 7XlY0jL3Pt7FFlkBKX8uM6joQbN7zhCtHr3ME8NsAD2zEYTmxVgVhk=;
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Thu, 17 Nov 2016 02:24:15 +0100
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Thu, 17 Nov 2016 02:24:14 +0100
Received: from [31.133.140.36] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50005226961.msg for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 02:24:13 +0100
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-HashCash: 1:20:161117:md50005226961::O1pdG64MIaf8D9H5:00000PJW
X-MDRemoteIP: 31.133.140.36
X-Return-Path: prvs=112957b6f1=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ietf@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1b.0.161010
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:24:10 +0900
Subject: Re: [IAOC] question to the IAOC: new committee members
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: IAOC IAOC <iaoc@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <D2830076-744E-41F8-9E78-1C0E98437D52@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [IAOC] question to the IAOC: new committee members
References: <936695FE-FC31-4C91-9D49-38C39F44207A@consulintel.es> <6d35beeb-337c-8791-5e58-a224daa65e2b@gmail.com> <5AEE86FE-E7F3-469E-966E-C10E7B1364DD@consulintel.es> <6286A351-A5A5-48A8-971F-79B5901CB887@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <6286A351-A5A5-48A8-971F-79B5901CB887@sobco.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/qZDQTNZK7q7Hir1o4LFbmKCwju0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:24:32 -0000

Of course, I checked all the minutes, before my first posting on this. I read them once per month or so.

I check them again right now. I see the case for the legal committee, or others that may have a single volunteer, which is perfectly fine then, but no details on the others …

Regards,
Jordi


-----Mensaje original-----
De: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>
Responder a: <sob@sobco.com>
Fecha: jueves, 17 de noviembre de 2016, 10:19
Para: <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
CC: IAOC IAOC <iaoc@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Asunto: Re: [IAOC] question to the IAOC: new committee members

    speaking for the legal committee, we had one volunteer that many of us know well - there was
    no specific scoring since we knew that the one volunteer would be fine and he was invited to join the committee.
    
    there was a few minutes discussion on an IAOC call and I assume that the result was minuted 
    but do not recall 
    
    Scott
    
    > On Nov 16, 2016, at 8:11 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:
    > 
    > I understand that and the workload increase, but clearly the way to accommodate to it, in a transparent way is to increase the number of seats, which I believe requires a small modification of RFC4071.
    > 
    > I think that “common” as you say is ok, but always with a predefined procedure, clear for all the community. For example:
    > 
    > 1) There is some scoring to appoint people depending on their capabilities/merits?
    > 2) Where are the detailed minutes of that decision process, so we can review it?
    > 
    > Regards,
    > Jordi
    > 
    > 
    > -----Mensaje original-----
    > De: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
    > Organización: University of Auckland
    > Responder a: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
    > Fecha: jueves, 17 de noviembre de 2016, 4:26
    > Para: <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, <ietf@ietf.org>, <iaoc@ietf.org>
    > Asunto: Re: question to the IAOC: new committee members
    > 
    >    Jordi,
    > 
    >    It's very common for committees to appoint sub-committees, within their
    >    range of responsibilities, and for sub-committees to coopt experts.
    > 
    >    I am not in the least shocked by this; in fact given the expansion of
    >    the IASA's workload over the last 10 years it seems entirely normal
    >    to me. I don't think anything has been hidden, and of course the IAOC
    >    as a whole remains responsible for the work of IASA subcommittees,
    >    according to section 3.2 of RFC4071. Specifically "The IAOC's mission
    >    is not to be engaged in the day-to-day administrative work of the IASA,
    >    but rather to provide appropriate direction, oversight, and approval."
    > 
    >    Regards
    >       Brian
    > 
    >    On 16/11/2016 23:38, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
    >> All the IETF positions have rules to be selected, nomcom, etc., and there is a great transparency on the process.
    >> 
    >> However today we discovered that new members have been selected for IAOC committees.
    >> 
    >> What have been the rules/process for that?
    >> 
    >> One of the questions that have been discussed several times is the lack of transparency from the IAOC, and clearly here we have a new demonstration of that.
    >> 
    >> I hope there is a clear statement from IAOC explaining the process.
    >> 
    >> If that not happens, what is the process to appeal that decision, so I can follow it?
    >> 
    >> We as a community, in my opinion, can’t keep going with this lack of transparency.
    >> 
    >> Regards,
    >> Jordi
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> **********************************************
    >> IPv4 is over
    >> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
    >> http://www.consulintel.es
    >> The IPv6 Company
    >> 
    >> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > **********************************************
    > IPv4 is over
    > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
    > http://www.consulintel.es
    > The IPv6 Company
    > 
    > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
    > 
    > 
    > 
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.