Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sun, 31 October 2021 10:12 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5CF3A096D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 03:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DRmTztGmQsFN for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 03:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CF193A08E3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 03:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C5132003F4; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 06:12:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 31 Oct 2021 06:12:44 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=502+EzNhgx9jON40cQanU+5adDjvgswL9vnY7v0EX ZY=; b=MJFpP5exfWVZsTFwY3eHU4YdEq8IrAhksrfxYXth1PimweIuwj65PMJJF tfP94uZxegQDOk1HqT3WioLH4E81hKb4JC5AKqEvQHlx18ouwyx8EaKbbXF5AQKU amQBVrPQwHwghJ6ppynjuhZ/lSQ8yTKUV++RQ730NH4VTjn3oqPZtUNPmNDBSw/g 00sBr8GlmMv2qYdLFU4fR4Ia/iVrLC92kkm2xKxfvs2D/uRmbqeWe32g2ZZ6iVr/ zRC4UqYH/ca6oDOZiog5XQw20sqZcCzuZp7DmCpMBr6LiC19HUGMwssONhJY2wYJ /3mu3hp1e6ZfNlCzwqlwbE1wdiMbQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:G2x-YVU5z0dlUDudY8i2WqPhEBmD3oPpry2OthX3X5ndcWS9GUoZ1Q> <xme:G2x-YVnjD5nQjn1QFjqJz29TSZYqqBSosgnPLpJq1il2uRvj8FU50v0B3sNfUKnOq i4fU1j6xGtSWQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:G2x-YRYbci2lnNX0T6CkKw8iUOq1WXmPtYPPNzvlDDGXV8BqLPLxuJ2-LJg72M4GzK48wPNe_otMmtzQJ5hPasN1uDnIHacS_Dc1Eh_-r308cnCox74fhYk>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvdehtddguddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpegtgfgguffhjgffkfhfvffosehtqh hmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefftdevjeevhf elueekveelkeduledufeehiefgvdfhueehueeggffggefgueduheenucevlhhushhtvghr ufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorh hkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:G2x-YYW4Fi8W5BMLhjzUS81vmvl2OWNc7oX3iCUqXxdCqKJXZR7nZg> <xmx:G2x-YfnSUyM5847AmyKFjWXrIieh35PYhZCZmh7ESPfFLN1ANjwNVQ> <xmx:G2x-YVcmr0Zo70bMg8xEPyei3H50FGbF_t121n9u__tqX3QANsQUuw> <xmx:G2x-YXtvGJCzG1FgwI9V1MAei54rwbhoYuLIqxu5ugIK0jagBF5YqQ>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 06:12:42 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <8F4B97EA-665F-4A59-B99D-791B4AB9F2F7@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 06:12:41 -0400
Cc: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Message-Id: <746C1453-FFB0-46E5-ABF2-8630DC23B959@network-heretics.com>
References: <8F4B97EA-665F-4A59-B99D-791B4AB9F2F7@yahoo.co.uk>
To: Lloyd W <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18F72)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/qlLKhPJAVTTu4CfeGWksdZyf0nM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 10:12:56 -0000


Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 31, 2021, at 6:07 AM, Lloyd W <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 31 Oct 2021, at 20:10, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> wrote:
>> 
>>  But we have now become so fragmented that it's hard for us to discover new shared values or evolve the old ones.   I used to call this the Tower of Babel effect, but it's much worse now than it was when I first saw it happening in the late 1990s
> 
> You have an open git issue on a document, you can work on and resolve it without having to interact with anyone who might decrease your productivity.
> 
> Get with the program.
> 

I don’t understand what you are trying to say.