Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard)

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Thu, 22 August 2013 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52E211E80FB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.245
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.245 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.354, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VeIl6wp125EN for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22c.google.com (mail-ob0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A2C11E81D9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id er7so3812046obc.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=xXV8IQjxCQqjIcfTprFxsZt1UZQrxI3VCjADO5fCSPM=; b=G325NukWonJQc3lJYFbTp6xqisEvB4PILgnBObnQ4+DAlomFzus004nCLa8YlSqIc+ IxygwsyjXwz//8Hmy1cr2yfwZN/GTUkk04M8mhWXcYgLFYURiNUR54sclA3QYNXPZy4c x+VHYgjh1FG/Ivdrfu4NktBHwsmbb0CyIzbB8jsr6J+EIduqNP7I0emtlAe+RW1c2Otg lDKx8t2DpDzVE4hJrDDynB+l6eQTydPXbUyH9bpb/Uf1cgdYq1nU9u5XceC0fm33KXqG mW9tgjkYsAQuh8C7QFAIZi/Ehssrf+wvOxHmBsGsgUf/1BWDAecFlCu+y0mangIh/FuQ ka9w==
X-Received: by 10.60.161.136 with SMTP id xs8mr3036385oeb.77.1377183255134; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.44.105 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:53:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <52161EB1.6010506@qti.qualcomm.com>
References: <20130819150521.GB21088@besserwisser.org> <20130819160549.61542.qmail@joyce.lan> <20130819190533.GA30516@besserwisser.org> <4751241.GTNxysAlzm@scott-latitude-e6320> <B443E973-858A-4958-964B-B0F0FBDF5A7A@virtualized.org> <CAMm+LwhcHOeUv0iqZmZ6wX-jOD1r-mRR0x8sbxaKrsU3k4CNBQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130821040003.GL607@mx1.yitter.info> <64700EE4-85B3-4179-904A-885770C6BBF4@virtualized.org> <7F8D4DA5-F80B-432B-8231-5B40ADB61783@frobbit.se> <521495EB.7060207@cisco.com> <1C40FB10-3705-4E80-8DEB-D14B63D24C97@frobbit.se> <5214A593.8030907@cisco.com> <E3B3B6B0-F17F-44D0-ACD1-53BDBAC6F2CB@frobbit.se> <5214F97B.2080400@dcrocker.net> <6D6829DE-1242-4877-BB5E-8ECD08D88CB2@frobbit.se> <52150722.1070307@dcrocker.net> <52150DF0.6070800@qti.qualcomm.com> <5215123E.5080203@dcrocker.net> <52151903.4030402@qti.qualcomm.com> <521533DB.4040001@dcrocker.net> <52161EB1.6010506@qti.qualcomm.com>
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:53:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPv4CP-hRRU21-fLNDJaFGSaBoWHwyhoACta+3xSoTiJtOdxkA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Rude responses (Was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard)
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e01183a18b6903c04e48a762d"
Cc: Crocker Dave <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:54:20 -0000

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>wrote:

> Some folks have simply dismissively said, "Go read the archive", without
> pointers.


Pete, I like your position, but I believe "go read the archive" or the
equivalent will continue to be a standard response unless someone is
responsible for giving a more thorough response. Who do you think that
should be?