Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Tue, 22 October 2013 18:56 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AAB11E823E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.488
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.488 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.111, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P7m-ZdKHCaM9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C32D11E8236 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1VYh7e-0001nY-GY; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 18:56:06 +0000
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:56:05 +0200
Message-ID: <m2eh7d3zju.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <5266C6CA.30900@gmail.com>
References: <5262FB95.8080500@gmail.com> <CAK41CSRKhD9W5WWm3xBJeb4U8Q6TbfG1EHnY_0BN7fC1QvO=iA@mail.gmail.com> <52657B0B.3080701@gmail.com> <m21u3d5zvo.wl%randy@psg.com> <5266B4A4.9020301@dcrocker.net> <5266C6CA.30900@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 18:56:49 -0000

> Anonymity is not a problem.  Behaving badly is a problem.
> I really never want to see someone's ejection justified on
> the basis of their putative "anonymity" again.  I am not
> arguing that mars.techno.cat@gmail.com ought to be allowed
> anywhere near an IETF mailing list but that the reason that
> was given for throwing him off was not correct.  We should
> be working to protect anonymity and privacy, not punishing it.

<aol>