Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists")

SM <sm@resistor.net> Fri, 30 November 2012 02:05 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9406721F89B7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:05:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.766
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.766 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.167, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PNmue3rCcHB3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:05:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C9A21F89A2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:05:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qAU25mn4000484; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:05:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1354241153; bh=6gphMw22XqMRpahusq/mbo3oUZOy4ZBYKlDbDV9Us+A=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=TMhDz+8UvOVdSHaH5L2KtX+TZJ1CgtQxCoYLHBagoOQ/lSNKDAoTNPe6lewZSBh8g xLPONzd4UYKE/zp8FbRT9ReRYiv5kmQMgqA8Qq4Tuy5tPlfPeh8K/ejGBej6Wmb5vo zvNHpR+JyRsFFHdQ0XHtDA9klMTgYyUomSOpR4xc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1354241153; i=@resistor.net; bh=6gphMw22XqMRpahusq/mbo3oUZOy4ZBYKlDbDV9Us+A=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=tzf1GG2Zpo93rIztrHqb8DAHXN/z85TG+8mAJ/CtYJj6DIr6v17sM3p5J/2GPXWUb t7xmbpx8zzeGQWOilewtPUKFmPSTa61r4pfEXya1dNmApXkl9sYmQxjZH+x7ssif+W BEKYnbpFWkPT7vp4/3sNwxfGWFgl8jw5WDT/k2BA=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20121129155742.0a015b90@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:37:46 -0800
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists")
In-Reply-To: <50B7ECD1.5080302@wonderhamster.org>
References: <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD5923033897C9BF@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <CALaySJLT=6RTZahqB1LO_Aw=7sAMiyrXK=xacwrBgLieZhqeDw@mail.gmail.com> <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD59230338A657EC@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121129105444.0b8d3400@resistor.net> <02ba01cdce76$be921580$3bb64080$@olddog.co.uk> <50B7ECD1.5080302@wonderhamster.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 02:05:55 -0000

Hi Spencer,
At 15:16 29-11-2012, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
>In addition to the cases Adrian asked about, isn't there also the 
>case of an author/editor updating a draft that has already been 
>discussed and then submitting it during IETF week?

Yes.

Regards,
-sm